Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535185›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2024

Novel virulence determinants in VP1 regulate the assembly of enterovirus-A71.

Wenjing Zhang, Quanjie Li, Dongrong Yi, Ruifang Zheng, Guihua Liu, Qian Liu, Saisai Guo, Jianyuan Zhao, Jing Wang, Ling Ma and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Serial passagingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Wenjing ZhangInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Quanjie LiInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Dongrong YiInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ruifang ZhengXinjiang Key Laboratory of Uygur Medical Research, Xinjiang Institute of Materia Medica, Urumqi, China.
Guihua LiuXinjiang Key Laboratory of Uygur Medical Research, Xinjiang Institute of Materia Medica, Urumqi, China.
Qian LiuInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Saisai GuoInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianyuan ZhaoInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jing WangInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ling MaInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiwei DingInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhouInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yongcheng RenInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tingting SunInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ao ZhangInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu LiInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yongxin ZhangInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-9455
Shan CenInstitute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-0411

Funding

CAMS | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine () 2021-I2M-1-038CAMS | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine () 2021-I2M-1-039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterovirus-A71 (EV-A71) is the second most common causative agent after coxsackievirus A16 of hand, foot, and mouth disease. The capsids of EV-A71 consist of 60 copies of each of the four viral structural proteins (VP1-VP4). VP1 is highly exposed and surface accessible, playing a central role in virus particle assembly, attachment, and entry. To gain insight into the role of highly conserved residues at positions 75, 78, and 88 in the capsid protein VP1 in these processes, an alanine-scanning analysis was performed using an infectious cDNA clone of EV-A71. Our study revealed that the substitutions of VP1-T75A, VP1-T78A, and VP1-G88A could affect the assembly of the virus capsid proteins, resulting in the production of abnormal virions with reduced infectivity. Specifically, the substitution of VP1-T75A affected the maturation cleavage of the VP0 precursor, leading to deficiencies in binding to receptor scavenger receptor class B2 (SCARB2), viral attachment, internalization, and even uncoating. For the mutants of T78A and G88A, a significant reduction in virion-associated genomic RNA was observed, suggesting that more noninfectious empty particles were produced during viral assembly. Interestingly, the VP1-T75A variant showed weak replication in cell cultures but demonstrated increased virulence in BALB/c neonatal mice, which might be due to the difference in viral receptors among mammalian species. Taken together, our data revealed the important role of the highly conserved residues T75, T78, and G88 in VP1 protein in the infectivity of EV-A71. Characterizing these novel determinants of EV-A71 virulence would contribute to rationally developing effective treatments and broadly protective vaccine candidates. IMPORTANCE: EV-A71 causes hand, foot, and mouth disease in children. In this study, we discovered three highly conserved residues at positions 75, 78, and 88 of the capsid protein VP1 as the potential virulence determinants of EV-A71, which can influence viral replication by regulating the assembly of EV-A71. Mechanistic studies revealed that VP1-T75A could affect the maturation cleavage of the VP0 precursor, resulting in deficiencies in binding to the receptor SCARB2, viral attachment, internalization, and even uncoating. For the mutants of T78A and G88A, more noninfectious empty particles were produced during viral assembly. The discovery of these novel determinants of EV-A71 virulence will promote the study of the pathogenesis of enteroviruses.

Indexed as

Capsid ProteinsEnterovirus A, HumanEnterovirus InfectionsVirus AssemblyAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCapsidHumansLysosomal Membrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CReceptors, ScavengerVirionVirulenceVirulence FactorsVirus AttachmentCapsid ProteinsLysosomal Membrane ProteinsReceptors, ScavengerSCARB2 protein, humanVirulence Factorscapsid proteinEV-A71highly conserved residuesinfectivityvirulence determinants

Identifiers

PMID39535185
PMCPMC11650969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.