ReviewNeuro-oncology2025
Using a pre-radiation window to identify potentially active cytotoxic agents in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical management of BRAF inhibitors in glioma: toxicity and resistance.CNS oncology · 2026Review
- Point/counterpoint: Upfront BRAF inhibition for adult BRAF-mutant high-grade gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Pre-radiation targeted therapy for highly selected patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: New tricks for an old dog?Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapies shown to improve outcomes in patients with recurrent cancers are commonly used in the neoadjuvant setting to optimize surgery, reduce radiation fields, and treat micrometastatic disease. While the use of pre-radiation chemotherapy (PRC) has flourished in systemic cancers, it has not seen the same level of use in glioblastomas. This review documents these trajectories and highlights the potential of PRC to rapidly and safely screen cytotoxic drugs for efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Prospective trials of adults with newly diagnosed systemic and brain cancers treated with PRC published between 1980 and 2023 were identified in PubMed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were used to document the standard use of PRC in patients with systemic and brain cancers. Over 5000 prospective PRC trials in solid tumors were identified. These accrued >1 million patients and resulted in neoadjuvant therapies being the standard of care in ~28 systemic cancers. Only 50 similar trials (2206 patients) were identified in high-grade gliomas. In 13 trials containing PRC temozolomide (n = 846), radiographic responses ranged from 6 to 53% with a median survival of ~13 months. Glioblastoma PRC trials were not associated with unexpected toxicities or major negative impacts on survival. Pre-radiation chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma appears safe and feasible. The pre-radiation window is ideally suited to rapidly screen cytotoxic agents for efficacy. It permits radiographic response as a primary outcome, small sample sizes, and initiation of standard therapies a few months after diagnosis. Pre-radiation chemotherapy may be most appropriate for patients with glioblastoma who are unlikely to benefit from temozolomide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.