Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534887›Full record

ArticleResearch on language and social interaction2024

The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia: Determining Who Talks When.

I L Windeatt-Harrison, T Walker, S M Bell, D Blackburn, J M Dickson, S Jones, A Wardrope, M Reuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research on language and social interaction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I L Windeatt-HarrisonDivision of Human Communication Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-4723
T WalkerDivision of Human Communication Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-7232
S M BellDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-6478
D BlackburnDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-1283
J M DicksonAcademic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-2714
S JonesRotherham Older Adults Hospital Liaison Team and Young Onset Dementia Service, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK.
A WardropeDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-6346
M ReuberDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-6705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyone should have the opportunity to participate in decisions about their health, including people living with dementia. People with dementia typically bring a companion to medical appointments, so most care decisions are made in interactions involving three parties. To make decisions about their care, patients with dementia must have the opportunity to take a turn-at-talk in conversations where decisions are made. However, negotiating who speaks next in triadic talk is a complex task, especially when dementia-associated language and/or memory problems impact communication. Findings show that using second person ("you") pronouns assist people with dementia in responding to queries, yet third person ("she/he") can exclude them from the interaction, although this near-canonical pronoun use can be overridden by sequential placement, gesture, and gaze. We also demonstrate how midturn pronoun switching often only provides for tokenistic inclusion, though this again is dependent on sequential placement and embodied interaction. Data are in English.

Identifiers

PMID39534887
PMCPMC11552697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.