Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2024

Exploring the experience of participants in a pilot scheme to recognise teaching excellence in healthcare: A mixed methods approach.

Dianne Burns, Jess Grundy, Helen White, Deborah A O'Connor, Christine Furber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dianne BurnsSchool of Health Sciences/School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Jess GrundySchool of Health Sciences/School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Helen WhiteSchool of Health Sciences/School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Deborah A O'ConnorFaculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, 53 Bonsall Street, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK.
Christine FurberSchool of Health Sciences/School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Within healthcare settings, practice-based healthcare professionals are expected to teach, supervise, assess and/or support learners in their respective disciplines. Ongoing development opportunities focusing specifically on teaching skills and support of students are varied and there are no mandatory requirements for practice-based healthcare professionals to develop formal teaching qualifications, despite their direct involvement with learners. Objective: To explore the experience of participants in a pilot scheme to recognise teaching excellence in healthcare. Design: A mixed methods approach was used. Settings: One inner-city integrated health care system in the UK. Participants: This study involved eleven participants in total: seven applicants who successfully completed the award and four mentors who supported them throughout the application process. Mentors were all Advance HE Fellowship holders employed within one National Health Service (NHS) organisation and one Higher Education Institution situated within the Northwest of England. Methods: Data collection methods included an online anonymised survey followed by individual semi- structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis principles. Results: The findings indicated that participants (applicants and mentors) found the overall experience positive and rewarding. The main positive aspects of taking part were:I. Increased confidence and sharing of teaching experience.II. Increased reflection and use of pedagogy.III. Formation of a teaching community of practice.IV. Perceived teaching career progression opportunities.The application process appeared to act as a catalyst towards re-engagement with underpinning pedagogy when considering the suitability and utility of effective teaching approaches for learners in practice. It also helped to promote a teaching community of practice where mentors were able to 'pay forward' and support practice colleagues to be recognised for their teaching roles.The main challenges were the competing demands on applicants' time and the self-directed approach required to complete the award application. Conclusion: Gaining recognition of teaching excellence through an award scheme such as Advance HE Fellowship can foster a sense of empowerment, recognition and reward for educators who work with learners undertaking Higher Education Programmes, irrespective of the setting where teaching and learning takes place. However, without wider organisation support and resources, the benefits of such schemes can be diminished. Registration: N/A. Tweetable abstract: With institutional support, Advance HE Fellowships offer accessible recognition for healthcare educator's commitment to teaching excellence @AdvanceHE @NHSE_WTE.

Indexed as

Advance HE professional standards frameworkBedside teachingClinical educationCommunities of practiceContinuing professional developmentHealthcare educatorsHigher educationMixed methodsProfessional educationRecognitionTeacherTeaching excellenceTutor

Identifiers

PMID39534883
PMCPMC11554622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.