Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534724›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Compensatory mechanisms amidst demyelinating disorders: insights into cognitive preservation.

Noor Z Al Dahhan, Julie Tseng, Cynthia de Medeiros, Sridar Narayanan, Douglas L Arnold, Brian C Coe, Douglas P Munoz, E Ann Yeh, Donald J Mabbott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noor Z Al DahhanNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3483-4551
Julie TsengNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Cynthia de MedeirosNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Sridar NarayananDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6283-150X
Douglas L ArnoldDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Brian C CoeCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
E Ann YehNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Donald J MabbottNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6161-5066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demyelination disrupts the transmission of electrical signals in the brain and affects neurodevelopment in children with disorders such as multiple sclerosis and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disorders. Although cognitive impairments are prevalent in these conditions, some children maintain cognitive function despite substantial structural injury. These findings raise an important question: in addition to the degenerative process, do compensatory neural mechanisms exist to mitigate the effects of myelin loss? We propose that a multi-dimensional approach integrating multiple neuroimaging modalities, including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetoencephalography and eye-tracking, is key to investigating this question. We examine the structural and functional connectivity of the default mode and executive control networks due to their significant roles in supporting higher-order cognitive processes. As cognitive proxies, we examine saccade reaction times and direction errors during an interleaved pro- (eye movement towards a target) and anti-saccade (eye movement away from a target) task. 28 typically developing children, 18 children with multiple sclerosis and 14 children with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disorders between 5 and 18.9 years old were scanned at the Hospital for Sick Children. Tractography of diffusion MRI data examined structural connectivity. Intracellular and extracellular microstructural parameters were extracted using a white matter tract integrity model to provide specific inferences on myelin and axon structure. Magnetoencephalography scanning was conducted to examine functional connectivity. Within groups, participants had longer saccade reaction times and greater direction errors on the anti- versus pro-saccade task; there were no group differences on either task. Despite similar behavioural performance, children with demyelinating disorders had significant structural compromise and lower bilateral high gamma, higher left-hemisphere theta and higher right-hemisphere alpha synchrony relative to typically developing children. Children diagnosed with multiple sclerosis had greater structural compromise relative to children with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disorders; there were no group differences in neural synchrony. For both patient groups, increased disease disability predicted greater structural compromise, which predicted longer saccade reaction times and greater direction errors on both tasks. Structural compromise also predicted increased functional connectivity, highlighting potential adaptive functional reorganisation in response to structural compromise. In turn, increased functional connectivity predicted faster saccade reaction times and fewer direction errors. These findings suggest that increased functional connectivity, indicated by increased alpha and theta synchrony, may be necessary to compensate for structural compromise and preserve cognitive abilities. Further understanding these compensatory neural mechanisms could pave the way for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing these mechanisms, ultimately improving cognitive outcomes for affected individuals.

Indexed as

cognitive performancecompensatory mechanismsdemyelinating disordersnetwork connectivitystructure-function coupling

Identifiers

PMID39534724
PMCPMC11554762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.