ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2024
The Performance of 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria in a Real-World Rheumatology Department.
Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of performance of the Sapporo criteria, the revised Sapporo criteria, and the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Concordance and Relative Performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR and Revised Sapporo Criteria in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrent Thrombosis: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy-a hematologic perspective.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Heparin Dose Adjustment in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Associated with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Report.Annals of vascular diseases · 2026Article
- Role of antiphospholipid antibodies in kidney disease: Risk factors, immunopathogenesis, and diagnosis.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Diagnostic and Methodologic Approach.Metabolites · 2025Review
- From Circulating Biomarkers to Polymorphic Variants: A Narrative Review of Challenges in Thrombophilia Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is one of the most common acquired causes of hypercoagulability. The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS Classification Criteria were specified as new APS classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and research. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in a real-world rheumatology department. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the 2006 revised Sapporo and 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in patients diagnosed with APS through clinical evaluation. A total of 184 patients, 103 of whom were diagnosed with APS, were included in the study. Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria demonstrate higher specificity 98.8% (95% CI 93.3-99.8) and positive predictive value (PPV) 98.7% (95% CI 93.2-99.8). The revised Sapporo criteria exhibit higher sensitivity 90.3% (95% CI 83-96.6), negative predictive value (NPV) 88.1% (95% CI 79.4-93.4), and accuracy 90.8% (95% CI 85.7-94.1). When the diagnosis of APS was accepted according to the revised Sapporo criteria, the sensitivity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria was 77% (95% CI 67.8-84.2), specificity 97.6% (95% CI 91.7-99.3), PPV 97.5% (95% CI 69.3-84.9) and NPV 78.1% (95% CI 69.3-84.9). Conclusion: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria have low sensitivity and high specificity compared to the revised Sapporo APS classification criteria. The increase in specificity is due to risk assessment in thromboses and strict obstetric and laboratory criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.