Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534708›Full record

ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2024

The Performance of 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria in a Real-World Rheumatology Department.

Ahmet Usta, Müçteba Enes Yayla, Emine Uslu, Serdar Sezer, Ebru Us, Aşkın Ateş, Murat Turgay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy-a hematologic perspective.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmet UstaDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Müçteba Enes YaylaDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Emine UsluDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Serdar SezerDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ebru UsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Aşkın AteşDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat TurgayDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is one of the most common acquired causes of hypercoagulability. The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS Classification Criteria were specified as new APS classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and research. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in a real-world rheumatology department. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the 2006 revised Sapporo and 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in patients diagnosed with APS through clinical evaluation. A total of 184 patients, 103 of whom were diagnosed with APS, were included in the study. Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria demonstrate higher specificity 98.8% (95% CI 93.3-99.8) and positive predictive value (PPV) 98.7% (95% CI 93.2-99.8). The revised Sapporo criteria exhibit higher sensitivity 90.3% (95% CI 83-96.6), negative predictive value (NPV) 88.1% (95% CI 79.4-93.4), and accuracy 90.8% (95% CI 85.7-94.1). When the diagnosis of APS was accepted according to the revised Sapporo criteria, the sensitivity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria was 77% (95% CI 67.8-84.2), specificity 97.6% (95% CI 91.7-99.3), PPV 97.5% (95% CI 69.3-84.9) and NPV 78.1% (95% CI 69.3-84.9). Conclusion: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria have low sensitivity and high specificity compared to the revised Sapporo APS classification criteria. The increase in specificity is due to risk assessment in thromboses and strict obstetric and laboratory criteria.

Indexed as

Antiphospholipid syndromeClassificationNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID39534708
PMCPMC11556423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.