Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung biopsy tissue metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.

Jinbao Huang, Heng Weng, Ling Ye, Meiqin Jiang, Lulu Chen, Yangyu Li, Hongyan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing: new horizons in microbiology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinbao Huang *Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Heng Weng *Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Ling YeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Meiqin JiangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Lulu ChenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Yangyu LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Hongyan LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung biopsy tissue specimens. Methods: In this retrospective study, 321 patients diagnosed with lower respiratory tract diseases who underwent mNGS using BALF and LBT samples, between January 2021 and December 2023 were included. Individuals were classified into PC and non-PC groups according to the diagnostic criteria for PC, and conventional fungal cultures were performed. A serum/BALF cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) test was performed in some patients with PC. The diagnostic efficiencies of three methods for PC (mNGS, conventional culture, and CrAg) were compared. Additionally, two mNGS methods were used in this study: original mNGS (OmNGS, testing time from January 2021 to December 2022) and modified mNGS (MmNGS, testing time from January to December 2023). The diagnostic efficiency of the two mNGS methods on PC was simultaneously compared. Results: Among the 321 patients, 23 (7.2%) had PC and 298 (92.8%) did not. Compared with the composite reference standard for PC diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of mNGS for PC were 78.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8%-91.7%), 98.7% (95% CI, 96.4%-99.6%), and 97.2% (95% CI, 94.7%-98.7%), respectively. The sensitivity of mNGS was similar to that of CrAg (80.0%, 12/15) ( Conclusion: The sensitivity of mNGS is better than that of conventional culture. The combination of mNGS and CrAg improves the testing sensitivity of

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCryptococcosisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLungLung Diseases, FungalMetagenomicsSensitivity and SpecificityAdultAgedAntigens, FungalBiopsyCryptococcusCryptococcus neoformansFemaleHumansMaleAntigens, Fungalbronchoalveolar lavage fluidCryptococcus neoformanslung biopsy tissuemetagenomic next-generation sequencingpulmonary cryptococcosis

Identifiers

PMID39534702
PMCPMC11554620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.