ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024
Sericin coats of silk fibres, a degumming waste or future material?
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extreme Biomimetics: Achievements and Fundamental Challenges for the Future.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical progress and prospects of biodegradable intestinal stents.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Highly Purified Sericin and Waste-Derived Sericin: Implications for Biomedical Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recycled Sericin Biopolymer in Biotechnology and Bioelectronics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reduction-Responsive Nanoparticles Self-Assembled from Sericin-ss-Doxorubicin Conjugate for Hydrophobic IR780 Delivery with Integration of Antitumor Chemo-Phototherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silk is a fibrous biopolymer with a recorded history in the textile industries for centuries. This fibre is constituted of two different proteins: fibroin and sericin, of which the latter accounting for approximately 20-30 % of the silk mass. Silk sericin (SSER) was previously considered as a waste by-product in silk fibroin extraction. SSER has recently garnered significant scientific interest due to its extensive biological and pharmacological properties. These include antioxidant effects, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, controlled biodegradability, and the ability to induce cell proliferation. This review covers studies about various aspects of this emerging material, namely, its general morphology, specific structure, molecular weight, features of different layers, and gene sequences. The impact of different extraction methods and the application of extracted SSER based on molecular weight are discussed. Additionally, the characteristic functional groups in the amino acids of sericin facilitate its applications in regenerative medicine, wound healing, drug delivery, textile, environment, and energy, in various forms like hydrogels, films, scaffolds, and conduits. SSER-based materials offer great potentials for multi-functional applications in the upcoming decades, showcasing adaptability for various functional uses and promising future technological advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.