Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534675›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2024

Preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery among HIV-negative pregnant and breastfeeding women in Zambia: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Twaambo Euphemia Hamoonga, Wilbroad Mutale, Jude Igumbor, Samuel Bosomprah, Olujide Arije, Benjamin H Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Twaambo Euphemia HamoongaDepartment of Population Studies and Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Wilbroad MutaleDepartment of Health Systems Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jude IgumborResearch Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Samuel BosomprahResearch Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Olujide ArijeInstitute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

A dyad approach to combination HIV prevention in pregnancy for Zambia and MalawiR01AI131060 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H., MUTALE, WILBROAD · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
The UNC-UNZA-Wits Partnership for HIV and Women's Reproductive HealthD43TW010558 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H., CHIBWESHA, CARLA J · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Expanding cancer research capacity in Nigeria with team scienceD43CA260646 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI T PETER KINGHAM · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
Mentoring new investigators in PMTCT implementation researchK24AI120796 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Benjamin H. Chi · 2016 to 2026
$1.3M
Promoting PrEP shared decision-making and adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women in ZambiaK01MH121186 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HILL, LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$906k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010558NCI NIH HHS D43 CA260646NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI120796NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI131060NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant and breastfeeding women at substantial risk for HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa can benefit from biomedical interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We estimated the benefit that pregnant and breastfeeding women may derive from PrEP service delivery in order to guide PrEP roll-out in the target population in Zambia. Methods: Between September and December 2021, we conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among a convenient sample of 389 pregnant and breastfeeding women not living with HIV in Lusaka, Zambia. Women aged 18 years or older, with a documented negative HIV result in their antenatal card responded to a structured questionnaire containing 12 choice sets on service delivery attributes of PrEP: waiting time at the facility, travel time to the facility dispensing PrEP, location for PrEP pick-up, health care provider attitude and PrEP supply at each refill. Mixed logit regression analysis was used to determine the participant's willingness to trade off one attribute of PrEP for the other at a 5% significance level. Willingness to wait (WTW) was used to determine the relative utility derived from each attribute against waiting time. Results: Waiting time at the facility, travel time to the facility, health care provider attitude and amount of PrEP supply at each refill were important attributes of PrEP service delivery (all Conclusion: Patient-centered approaches can help to inform the design and implementation of PrEP services among pregnant and breastfeeding women. In this study, we found that a reduction in clinic visits-including through multi-month dispensing of PrEP-could improve uptake of services in antenatal and postnatal settings.

Indexed as

breastfeedingdiscrete choice experimentHIV/AIDSpreferencespregnantPrEPZambia

Identifiers

PMID39534675
PMCPMC11555771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.