ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
Does financing for private maternity services improve birth experiences in Poland? A mixed-methods study of the Babies Born Better Survey.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWomen in Poland, despite having access to publicly-funded medical care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period, frequently use private care. Women's experience and satisfaction with childbirth have been considered one of the key indicators of the quality of care. In this study we explore whether and how paying for private childbirth services affects women's experiences and satisfaction with care. The qualitative portion seeks to understand how individual women construct meaning around their childbirth experiences, including their relationships with healthcare personnel, medical interventions, birth environment, and professionalism.
methodsThis mixed-methods study is based on data from 951 online questionnaires completed by women who gave birth between June 2017 and June 2022, in Poland. This study is part of the international Babies Born Better Survey project. The project used simultaneous quantitative and qualitative data collection, it was exploratory with equivalent status of qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and chi-squared tests were conducted to compare women who used private and public care. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The quantitative and qualitative results were integrated, in accordance with the chosen mixed-methods design.
resultsThere were no major differences in sociodemographic characteristics (except living standards), health status and satisfaction with labor between women who paid for private services during childbirth and those who used only publicly-funded care. For both groups of women, healthcare personnel and their behavior were the most frequently mentioned aspect shaping childbirth experiences. Other important aspects were: medical interventions, birth environment, and staff professionalism.
conclusionsAlthough accessing private perinatal services care did not provide women with care consistent with their expectations, women put a lot of trust into private services as a means to receive more attentive care. Further research investigating the interplay between private and public services is needed to explore the question how private services may impact the care women receive and why women put so much trust in these services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.