Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534581›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2024

Breast ultrasound knobology and the knobology of twinkling for marker detection.

Christine U Lee, Gina K Hesley, Taylor A Pierson, Rebecca L Higgins, Matthew W Urban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Selection of Breast Biopsy Markers: Effect on Breast Imaging Procedures, Follow-up, and Costs.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine U LeeDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-6949
Gina K HesleyDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1246-696X
Taylor A PiersonDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rebecca L HigginsDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew W UrbanDepartment of Radiology, Division of Radiology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-4287

Funding

Development of an ultrasound detectable, migration-resistant biopsy marker for improving care in patients with breast cancerR01EB033008 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Christine U. Lee, Matthew William Urban · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast ultrasound utilizes various scanning techniques to acquire optimal images for diagnostic evaluation. During interventional procedures, such as ultrasound-guided biopsies or preoperative localizations, knowledgeable and purposeful scanning adjustments are critical for successfully identifying the targeted mass or biopsy marker or clip. While most ultrasound scanning parameters are similar across different vendors, detailed descriptions specifically addressing the scanning parameters-often referred to as "knobology"- for breast ultrasound is at best limited in the literature. This review highlights ten key operator-controlled adjustments (including transducer selection, beam focusing, power, depth, gain and time gain compensation, harmonic imaging, spatial compounding, dynamic range, beam steering, and color Doppler) that significantly influence image quality in breast ultrasound. Each adjustment is accompanied by an "In practice" section providing examples and practical tips on implementation. The last topic discusses color Doppler which is generally used in breast ultrasound for evaluating the vascularity of a finding. Color Doppler, or more specifically, color Doppler twinkling, can be leveraged as a technique to detect certain breast biopsy markers that are challenging to detect by conventional B-mode ultrasound. While the cause of color Doppler twinkling is still under active investigation, twinkling is a clinically well-known, compelling ultrasound feature typically described with kidney stones. A step-by-step guide on how to use color Doppler twinkling to detect these markers is provided.

Indexed as

Breast ultrasoundcolor Doppler twinklingknobologytwinklingultrasound scanning

Identifiers

PMID39534581
PMCPMC11557156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.