ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2024
Breast ultrasound knobology and the knobology of twinkling for marker detection.
Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selection of Breast Biopsy Markers: Effect on Breast Imaging Procedures, Follow-up, and Costs.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2026Review
- Article
- AI-mediated ultrasound radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: research progress and future challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast ultrasound utilizes various scanning techniques to acquire optimal images for diagnostic evaluation. During interventional procedures, such as ultrasound-guided biopsies or preoperative localizations, knowledgeable and purposeful scanning adjustments are critical for successfully identifying the targeted mass or biopsy marker or clip. While most ultrasound scanning parameters are similar across different vendors, detailed descriptions specifically addressing the scanning parameters-often referred to as "knobology"- for breast ultrasound is at best limited in the literature. This review highlights ten key operator-controlled adjustments (including transducer selection, beam focusing, power, depth, gain and time gain compensation, harmonic imaging, spatial compounding, dynamic range, beam steering, and color Doppler) that significantly influence image quality in breast ultrasound. Each adjustment is accompanied by an "In practice" section providing examples and practical tips on implementation. The last topic discusses color Doppler which is generally used in breast ultrasound for evaluating the vascularity of a finding. Color Doppler, or more specifically, color Doppler twinkling, can be leveraged as a technique to detect certain breast biopsy markers that are challenging to detect by conventional B-mode ultrasound. While the cause of color Doppler twinkling is still under active investigation, twinkling is a clinically well-known, compelling ultrasound feature typically described with kidney stones. A step-by-step guide on how to use color Doppler twinkling to detect these markers is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.