Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534471›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Emotions and interactive tangible tools for math achievement in primary schools.

Filippo Saccardo, Gisella Decarli, Valentina Irene Missagia, Margherita Andrao, Federica Gini, Massimo Zancanaro, Laura Franchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filippo SaccardoDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Gisella DecarliDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Valentina Irene MissagiaDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Margherita AndraoDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Federica GiniDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Massimo ZancanaroDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Laura FranchinDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acquiring mathematical concepts is crucial for students' academic achievements, future prospects and overall well-being. This study explores the role of emotions in a symbolic number comparison task and the impact of the use of a tangible tool. Methods: Fifty-nine healthy children aged 6 to 7 years participated in a between-subject study with two conditions for the modality, digital tools vs the use of pen and paper, and two conditions for emotions, positive vs neutral. Results: The study provided evidence that positive emotions can improve task efficiency for pen and paper modality, and the use of the digital tool improves task efficiency with both positive and negative emotions. Discussion: These findings suggest that addressing emotional factors before engaging in a symbolic task can enhance learning and that interactive technology may give a more significant benefit to students with less positive attitudes toward the task. Incorporating effective teaching methodologies that utilize tangible devices within a positive emotional context can foster engagement and achievement in mathematics, optimizing students' learning experiences.

Indexed as

childrenemotionsmath learningprimary educationtangible tools

Identifiers

PMID39534471
PMCPMC11554489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.