ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2024
Performance Investigations of Two Channel Readout Configurations on the Cross-Strip Cadmium Zinc Telluride Detector.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a detector system where the number of channels exceeds the number of channels available on an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), there is a need to configure channels among multiple ASICs to achieve the lowest electronic noise and highest count rate. In this work, two board configurations were designed to experimentally assess which one provides the more favorable performance. In the half-half configuration, contiguous channels from one edge to the center of CZT detector are read by one ASIC, and the other half are read by the other ASIC. In the alternate configuration, the CZT channels are read by alternating ASICs. A lower electronic noise level, better FWHM energy resolution performance (5.35% ± 1.08% compared to 7.84% ± 0.98%), and higher count rate was found for the anode electrode strips with half-half configuration. Cross-talk between ASICs and deadtime play a role in the different performances, and the total count rate of the half-half configuration has a count rate 18.1% higher than that of the alternate configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.