ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Quantifying Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Engagement in the Evolution of ICD-10 Codes.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of lip and oral cavity cancer and projections to 2036.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code specificity is important for detailed diagnostic documentation. Insufficient coding granularity in plastic surgery may hinder accurate clinical documentation, impacting education, research, and patient care. This study examines ICD-10 code modification efforts by plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations within the last decade, subsequently detailing the formal proposal process and highlighting potential areas where coding modifications may be explored. Methods: A retrospective review of all modification proposals presented to the ICD Coordination and Maintenance Committee from March 2013 to March 2023 was conducted. Plastic surgery-related proposals were identified and evaluated for successful implementation. These results were compared to those of other specialties using Fisher exact tests and 2-tailed Results: A total of 472 unique proposals were identified and reviewed. Surgeons and/or surgical organizations contributed to 111 (23.5%) novel proposals, 41 (36.9%) of which were initiated by surgeons. Nine surgical specialties and 14 supporting organizations were represented. The success rate for all surgical-related proposals was 85.6%, with an average time to implementation of 24.7 months. Only 2 (1.8%) of all surgical-related proposals pertained to plastic surgery, both of which were successfully implemented. Conclusions: Though a few plastic surgeons have taken advantage of the ICD code revision process within the last decade, the high overall success rate for surgical-related proposals suggests that this seems to be a feasible method by which plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations can bring about useful coding changes that meaningfully impact clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.