Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534368›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Quantifying Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Engagement in the Evolution of ICD-10 Codes.

Rachel Donaldson, Taylor G Hallman, Umer Qureshi, Hannah Soltani, Christian Arcelona, Kristof S Gutowski, Anitesh Bajaj, Arun K Gosain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel DonaldsonFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Taylor G HallmanFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Umer QureshiFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Hannah SoltaniFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Christian ArcelonaFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Kristof S GutowskiFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Anitesh BajajFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.
Arun K GosainFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code specificity is important for detailed diagnostic documentation. Insufficient coding granularity in plastic surgery may hinder accurate clinical documentation, impacting education, research, and patient care. This study examines ICD-10 code modification efforts by plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations within the last decade, subsequently detailing the formal proposal process and highlighting potential areas where coding modifications may be explored. Methods: A retrospective review of all modification proposals presented to the ICD Coordination and Maintenance Committee from March 2013 to March 2023 was conducted. Plastic surgery-related proposals were identified and evaluated for successful implementation. These results were compared to those of other specialties using Fisher exact tests and 2-tailed Results: A total of 472 unique proposals were identified and reviewed. Surgeons and/or surgical organizations contributed to 111 (23.5%) novel proposals, 41 (36.9%) of which were initiated by surgeons. Nine surgical specialties and 14 supporting organizations were represented. The success rate for all surgical-related proposals was 85.6%, with an average time to implementation of 24.7 months. Only 2 (1.8%) of all surgical-related proposals pertained to plastic surgery, both of which were successfully implemented. Conclusions: Though a few plastic surgeons have taken advantage of the ICD code revision process within the last decade, the high overall success rate for surgical-related proposals suggests that this seems to be a feasible method by which plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations can bring about useful coding changes that meaningfully impact clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID39534368
PMCPMC11557075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.