ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Using patient-generated health data more efficient and effectively to facilitate the implementation of value-based healthcare in the EU - Innovation report.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screenathon 2.0: human-AI collaborative screening applied to patient-generated health data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Biomedical Datasets to Fairness-Aware Recommendations: An Integrated Data Orchestration Pipeline for Binary Clinical Predictions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Integrating big data and artificial intelligence to predict progression in multiple sclerosis: challenges and the path forward.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- ASReview LAB v.2: Open-source text screening with multiple agents and a crowd of experts.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Patient-Generated Data as Indicators of Impact of Multidisciplinary and Multi-stakeholder Health Care Systems, in the Age of Personalised Medicine.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Streamlining wearable data integration for EHDS: a case study on advancing healthcare interoperability using Garmin devices and FHIR.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Empathy mapping and hybrid persona creation: Understanding older adults' needs in technology design for ageing in place.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare services and products are rapidly changing due to the development of new technologies, offering relevant solutions to improve patient outcomes. Patient-Generated Health Data and knowledge-sharing across the European Union (EU) has a great potential of making healthcare provision more effective and efficient by putting the patient at the centre of the healthcare process. While such initiatives have been taken before, a uniting and overarching approach is still missing. The EU-funded IMPROVE project will develop an evidence-based and actual framework to effectively leverage the added value of people-centred integrated healthcare solutions, using predominantly PROMs, PPI, PREMs, and other Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD). As a result, the project facilitates the effective and efficient implementation of Value-Based Healthcare across the EU by putting the patient central in the healthcare process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.