Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534347›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2024

Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support?

Jean-Luc A Maigrot, Lucy Thuita, Michael Z Y Tong, Edward G Soltesz, Nicholas G Smedira, Shinya Unai, Randall C Starling, Andrew Higgins, David Moros, Eugene H Blackstone and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complications Leading to Death in Patients Supported by the Impella 5.5: Analysis From the FDA MAUDE Database.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jean-Luc A MaigrotDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lucy ThuitaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael Z Y TongDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Edward G SolteszDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Nicholas G SmediraDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Shinya UnaiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Randall C StarlingDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Andrew HigginsDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
David MorosDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eugene H BlackstoneDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Aaron J WeissDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify possible etiology-specific differences in preoperative risk factors for major adverse events during Impella 5.5 support in patients with ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods: From October 2019 to January 2023, 228 Impella 5.5 devices were inserted at our institution. Patients were stratified into ICM (n = 124) and NICM (n = 104) cohorts. The primary outcome was a composite of death/stroke/new-onset dialysis while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Random forests identified preoperative factors predictive of the primary outcome separately for each cohort, with ranking by variable importance. Results: The primary outcome occurred in 42 (34%) patients with ICM and 35 (34%) patients with NICM. Twenty-one (17%) patients with ICM and 21 (20%) patients with NICM died on Impella 5.5; stroke occurred in 12 (9.7%) patients with ICM and 3 (2.9%) patients with NICM, and new-onset dialysis was initiated in 23 (19%) patients with ICM and 24 (23%) patients with NICM while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Risk factors reflecting systemic and myocardial cellular injury, end-organ and cardiopulmonary failure, right ventricular dysfunction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions were most predictive of adverse outcomes in both cohorts. Indications for Impella 5.5 and device strategy (bridge to recovery, advanced therapies, or decision) were not top risk factors in either cohort. Conclusions: Risk factors related to preoperative stability, right ventricular dysfunction, and left ventricular size were more predictive of adverse outcomes while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support than indication or device strategy. These factors could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from additional tailored management to reduce their risk for these impactful adverse outcomes while on Impella 5.5 support.

Indexed as

ischemic cardiomyopathynonischemic cardiomyopathytemporary mechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID39534347
PMCPMC11551278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.