ArticleJTCVS open2024
Improving prediction accuracy of spread through air spaces in clinical-stage T1N0 lung adenocarcinoma using computed tomography imaging models.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research hotspots and trends in lung cancer STAS: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of predictive models for spread through air spaces in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Lobar versus sub-lobar resection for clinical stage IA (≤ 2 cm) lung neuroendocrine tumor with spread through air spaces: a multi-center study.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop computed tomography (CT)-based models to increase the prediction accuracy of spread through air spaces (STAS) in clinical-stage T1N0 lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Three cohorts of patients with stage T1N0 lung adenocarcinoma (n = 1258) were analyzed retrospectively. Two models using radiomics and deep neural networks (DNNs) were established to predict the lung adenocarcinoma STAS status. For the radiomic models, features were extracted using PyRadiomics, and 10 features with nonzero coefficients were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to construct the models. For the DNN models, a 2-stage (supervised contrastive learning and fine-tuning) deep-learning model, MultiCL, was constructed using CT images and the STAS status as training data. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to verify the predictive ability of both model types for the STAS status. Results: Among the radiomic models, the linear discriminant analysis model exhibited the best performance, with AUC values of 0.8944 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8241-0.9502) and 0.7796 (95% CI, 0.7089-0.8448) for predicting the STAS status on the test and external validation cohorts, respectively. Among the DNN models, MultiCL exhibited the best performance, with AUC values of 0.8434 (95% CI, 0.7580-0.9154) for the test cohort and 0.7686 (95% CI, 0.6991-0.8316) for the external validation cohort. Conclusions: CT-based imaging models (radiomics and DNNs) can accurately identify the STAS status of clinical-stage T1N0 lung adenocarcinoma, potentially guiding surgical decision making and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.