Molecular characteristics of CTX-M β-lactamase-producing and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli among deer in a popular tourist spot in Japan.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from wild deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) and fox (Vulpes vulpes schrencki) in Hokkaido: a pilot study on sustainable antimicrobial resistance monitoring.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026
   Article
2. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in wild birds in Japan.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as