ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2024
Serological and bacterial prevalence of
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatio-temporal analysis of human brucellosis in North Khorasan, Iran (2015-2023): A cross-sectional study.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Resurgence of Human Brucellosis in Khuzestan Province, Southwestern Iran: Epidemiological Trends From 2017 to 2024.International journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Epidemiological analysis of human brucellosis in North Khorasan province, Iran (2018-2023): a six-year multicenter retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Brucellosis, a zoonotic bacterial disease caused by Materials and Methods: Blood specimens were collected from 200 patients suspected of brucellosis after obtaining informed consent. Serum samples were tested using RBPT, Wright, and 2-ME agglutination tests. Blood samples were cultured on Brucella agar, and positive cultures underwent biotyping and PCR assays. A questionnaire identified correlated risk factors. Results: RBPT, Wright, and 2-ME tests showed 25% brucellosis seroprevalence in symptomatic patients. In contrast, the prevalence was 2.5% among those with positive blood cultures. Notably, all culture-positive patients were also serologically positive, with titers exceeding 1:320 in Wright and 2-ME tests. Most positive cases were in people in their 30s, with Conclusion: The findings highlighted the importance of comprehensive diagnostic approaches for accurate identification of brucellosis. Furthermore, education regarding close contact with animals and pasteurization of dairy products is essential for controlling human brucellosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.