ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2024
MIC trends of vancomycin and teicoplanin among methicillin resistant CoNS isolates from new born blood cultures in a tertiary care centre in Southern India.
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Coagulase-negative-Staphylococci (CoNS) are important etiological agent of bacteraemia in newborn babies. Methicillin resistant CoNS infections have only limited treatment options. The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Methicillin Resistant CoNS isolates from newborn blood cultures was studied with special reference to MICs of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin. Materials and Methods: The study population included Methicillin Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal isolates (MRCoNS) from newborn blood cultures, during a one-year period. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Methicillin resistant CoNS isolates was determined by macrobroth dilution method as per CLSI guidelines and by automated methods. Results: Coagulase Negative Staphylococci were the etiological agent in 73.7% (n=56) cases of neonatal bacteremia. Methicillin resistance in newborn CoNS was found to be 58.9%. All the MRCoNS isolates had vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs in the susceptible range. There were MRCoNS isolates with MICs in the upper limit of susceptible range for both vancomycin and teicoplanin, which can result in poor clinical response. Conclusion: Continuous large scale multi-centre surveillance studies with special attention to study the MIC pattern of the high-end anti-MRSA agents like vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid are to be carried out. This will help the clinicians to judiciously prescribe the antibiotics, which is very essential for antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.