ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2025
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting bacterial infections in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of risk factors and prediction models for multidrug-resistant bacterial pulmonary infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-based Assessment of Eyelid and Periorbital Parameters: Assisting Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Blepharoptosis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Analysis of influencing factors and construction of nomogram prediction model for pulmonary infection in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with type II respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Independent Risk Factors and Nomogram-Based Prediction of Pulmonary Fungal Infection in Lung Cancer Inpatients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial infection is a significant contributory factor in the pathogenesis of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and it has a pivotal role in exacerbating symptoms and precipitating mortality among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The early identification of bacterial infection in individuals with COPD remains a challenge. Therefore, the present study aimed to create and validate a risk assessment tool using easily accessible serum biomarkers to predict bacterial infection in individuals with AECOPD. A retrospective cohort study was carried out at Pingxiang People's Hospital (Pingxiang, China) from January 2023 to December 2023, involving individuals diagnosed with AECOPD. A total of 544 patients with AECOPD were randomly allocated to the two following groups: The training set, which included 70% (n=384) of the patients, and the validation set, which included 30% (n=160) of the patients. Subsequently, a nomogram model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training set. Its discriminatory ability and calibration were internally validated, while decision curve analyses were employed to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram. The incidence of bacterial infection in hospitalized patients with AECOPD was 50% in the training set and 48.1% in the validation set. The nomogram model incorporated independent factors associated with bacterial infection, including C-reactive protein, neutrophil elastase, procalcitonin and eosinophils, identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The area under the curve of the nomogram model was 0.835 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.795-0.875] in the training set and 0.785 (95% CI: 0.715-0.856) in the validation set. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration in the validation set [c-statistic: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.90)]. Furthermore, the discrimination and overfitting bias of the model were assessed through internal validation, revealing a C-index of 0.836 for the initial group and 0.788 for the subsequent validation set. The straightforward risk prediction model for early identification of bacterial infections is valuable for hospitalized patients with AECOPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.