ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
A national survey of first line antibiotic use in neonatal units - and the potential scope for iatrogenic sensorineural hearing loss prevention.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance for the management of neonatal sepsis recommends a first-line antibiotic regimen containing an aminoglycoside (gentamicin). Aminoglycoside exposure causes sensorineural hearing loss in individuals with a specific mitochondrial genetic variant (m.1555A>G). This variant can be detected promptly (in <30 min) by a point of care test. NICE does allow for variation in antibiotic regimes depending on local microbiology guidance. As practices can vary, this survey aimed to determine the current use of first-line antibiotic agents within neonatal units and postnatal wards across the UK. Design and setting: A telephone survey was conducted across all neonatal units in the United Kingdom. Responses were requested from a member of the neonatal team experienced in neonatal septic screening processes. One response was recorded per unit. Results: Of the 187 neonatal units, 186 (99%) responded to the survey. One unit declined to participate. The survey results show most neonatal units (93%) and postnatal wards (74%) across the United Kingdom use aminoglycosides as first-line antibiotic agents. Antibiotic regimes varied between different units and between different locations within the same hospital (NICU vs. postnatal wards). In cases where there was a contraindication to aminoglycosides, the most common alternative antibiotic was cefotaxime. Conclusions: Most neonatal units in the UK use an aminoglycoside antibiotic as first-line agent for suspected sepsis. This places infants with the m.1555A>G genetic variant at risk of iatrogenic hearing loss. There needs to be integration of point-of-care genetic testing within the neonatal septic screening pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.