ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
The influence of depth of sedation on motor evoked potentials monitoring in youth from 4 to 23 years old: preliminary data from a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Intracranial Cavernous Malformation Surgery: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The influence of various levels of sedation depth on motor evoked potentials (MEP) reproducibility in youth is still unclear because of a lack of data. We tested the hypothesis that a deeper level of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) [bispectral index (BIS) 40 ± 5 compared to 60 ± 5] can affect surgeon-directed MEP and their interpretation in youths. Methods: All patients received TIVA combined with propofol and remifentanil. TIVA was initially maintained at a BIS level of 60 ± 5. The sedation anesthesia was deepened to BIS level 40 ± 5 before the skin incision. MEP were recorded and interpreted at both BIS levels. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of the depth of sedation on the MEP reproducibility directed and interpreted by the surgical team in each patient separately. The secondary endpoint was to compare the relativized MEP parameters (amplitude and latency) in percentage at various levels of sedation in each patient separately. We planned to enroll 150 patients. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to analyze the results of the first 50 patients. Results: The surgical team successfully recorded and interpreted MEP in all 50 enrolled patients in both levels of sedation depth without any clinical doubts. The MEP parameters at BIS level 40 ± 5, proportionally compared with the baseline, were latency 104% (97-110%) and the MEP amplitudes 84.5% (51-109%). Conclusion: Preliminary data predict that deeper sedation (BIS 40 ± 5) does not affect the surgical team's interpretation of MEP in youth patients. These results support that surgeon-directed MEP may be an alternative when neurophysiologists are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.