ArticleKidney international reports2024
Perspectives of Patients and Clinicians on Reproductive Health Care and ADPKD.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Family Planning in Patients With ADPKD-Results From the DIPAK Consortium.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Family planning and reproductive care are essential but complex aspects of lifecycle management for individuals with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), given the potential genetic transmission and pregnancy-related complications. In this qualitative study, we studied the experiences and perspectives of patients with ADPKD and clinicians to identify areas for potential improvement in reproductive lifecycle care. Methods: Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in the Netherlands with patients with ADPKD, both men and women, who had children through varied reproductive choices; and clinicians, including (pediatric) nephrologists, obstetric gynecologists and geneticists. Thematic analysis, utilizing a grounded theory approach, was performed on verbatim transcriptions of recordings, followed by consensus discussions to finalize themes. Results: Nine focus groups involving 31 participants (16 patients and 15 physicians) identified 6 key themes. These included the need for timely and comprehensive information dissemination from puberty on, understanding patient-specific decision-making factors, improving tailored psychosocial guidance and communication, the need for systematic efforts to take care of missed (minor) at-risk patients, addressing inequities in access to care, and improving multidisciplinary collaboration. Conclusions: This study represents the first qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives on reproductive lifecycle care for ADPKD. We present valuable insights into factors influencing patients' reproductive decision-making, a comprehensive comparison between the perspectives of patients and clinicians on family planning and follow-up care of minors at risk for ADPKD, and recommendations for enhancing overall care quality. Incorporating these insights into clinical care could enhance patient-centered care and foster interdisciplinary collaborations to further improve the quality of reproductive health care services for individuals with ADPKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.