ArticleAsian journal of urology2024
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with neobladder diversion in females: Safety profile and functional outcomes.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Female Sexual Function After Radical Treatment for MIBC: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Sexual-Sparing Radical Cystectomy in the Robot-Assisted Era: A Review on Functional and Oncological Outcomes.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a standard treatment for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer and high-risk or very high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer not responding to adequate endovesical therapy. In women, traditionally RC is performed with hystero-adnexectomy and resection of the anterior vaginal wall, often resulting in sexual disorders. Vaginal-sparing techniques have been developed to improve functional outcomes. The present study explores the safety and the functional outcome of vaginal-sparing techniques. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive female patients undergoing robot-assisted RC (RARC) with neobladder diversion between October 2017 and February 2022. The indications for vaginal-sparing RC were absence of tumor on bladder neck or urethra and no sign of infiltration of posterior bladder wall at the preoperative MRI. Functional results were evaluated with the aid of five questions out of the Bladder Cancer Index questionnaire. Complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and cancer control was evaluated by recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 22 female patients underwent RARC with neobladder diversion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 17 (77%) cases. Clavien-Dindo grades III-IV complications occurred in four (18%) cases. After a mean follow-up of 29 (interquartile range 16-44) months, six (27.3%) patients developed distant metastases, and one (4.5%) woman loco-regional relapse. Sexual-sparing surgery was performed in 19 (86%) patients, and in the others the anterior vaginal wall was resected, but neobladder was still performed. During daytime, no patients reported total incontinence and 73% (11/15) reported total continence or only occasional leaks. Sexual results showed that seven of 15 (47%) women regained sexual activity after surgery, with a quality reported as "good" or "very good" in 40% of all 19 cases. Conclusion: RARC in female with anterior vaginal wall preservation is feasible. The approach showed a good safety profile, with satisfying results on continence and sexual activity. Sexual-sparing approaches should be carried out after correct patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.