Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533501›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

Influencing Factors of Nurses' Well-Being in Critical Care During Pandemic Era: A Systematic Review.

Maria Emma Musio, Marta Russo, Martina Barbieri, Andrea Moro, Milko Zanini, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco, Gianluca Catania

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Emma MusioDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-3135
Marta RussoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Martina BarbieriDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0038-2486
Andrea MoroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-3211
Milko ZaniniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-6279
Loredana SassoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-5937
Annamaria BagnascoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-8460
Gianluca CataniaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-071X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify factors protecting and hindering the well-being of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

backgroundThe unique work challenges of critical care nurses can undermine their professional and mental well-being; as evidenced by the prevailing literature on burnout, compassion fatigue, and moral distress. The COVID-19 pandemic has seen these professionals on the front lines and has raised many questions about professional well-being. Identifying the factors that protect and hinder the well-being of critical care nurses would help to develop the strategies necessary to reduce worrying phenomena associated with professional malaise. EVALUATION: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Web on Science. KEY ISSUES: After full text analysis, 25 papers were included in the current systematic review. Factors influencing the well-being of critical care nurses have been grouped into "Protective" and "Hindering."

conclusionsThis review shows that critical care nurses' well-being is influenced by factors like personal resilience and supportive work environments, which enhance their experience. Challenges include sociodemographic issues and the COVID-19 pandemic's impact. Addressing these factors is crucial for their well-being and the effectiveness of healthcare systems. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The well-being of nurses is intricately linked to the quality and security of patient care, ultimately influencing clinical outcomes. This review delves deeply into the multifaceted factors that affect the professional well-being of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recognizing these elements is critical for directing health policy toward the development of initiatives that bolster healthcare workers' welfare. Prioritizing the professional well-being of nurses is imperative, as it is fundamental in mitigating the increasing inclination towards job turnover, a challenge that is profoundly impacting the healthcare sector.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Critical CareCritical Care NursingNursing Staff, HospitalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WorkplaceburnoutCOVID‐19critical careintensive care unitsnursepandemicwell‐being

Identifiers

PMID39533501
PMCPMC11895411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.