ArticleSmall methods2025
Sainsc: A Computational Tool for Segmentation-Free Analysis of In Situ Capture Data.
Article in Small methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially guided in vivo single-cell functional genomics of postnatal heart.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Identifying 3D signal overlaps in spatial transcriptomics data with ovrlpy.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- GRIDGENE: Guided Region Identification based on Density of GENEs-a transcript density-based approach to characterize tissues by spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Single-cell-scale spatial transcriptome of the developing and adult mouse ovary.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sainsc: A Computational Tool for Segmentation-Free Analysis of In Situ Capture Data.Small methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) has become the method of choice for characterising the complexity of biomedical tissue samples. Until recently, scientists were restricted to SRT methods that can profile a limited set of target genes at high spatial resolution or transcriptome-wide but at a low spatial resolution. Through recent developments, there are now methods that offer both subcellular spatial resolution and full transcriptome coverage. However, utilising these new methods' high spatial resolution and gene resolution remains elusive due to several factors, including low detection efficiency and high computational costs. Here, we present Sainsc (Segmentation-free analysis of in situ capture data), which combines a cell-segmentation-free approach with efficient data processing of transcriptome-wide nanometre-resolution spatial data. Sainsc can generate cell-type maps with accurate cell-type assignment at the nanometre scale, together with corresponding maps of the assignment scores that facilitate interpretation of the local confidence of cell-type assignment. We demonstrate its utility and accuracy for different tissues and technologies. Compared to other methods, Sainsc requires lower computational resources and has scalable performance, enabling interactive data exploration. Sainsc is compatible with common data analysis frameworks and is available as open-source software in multiple programming languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.