Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533439›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

A survey to determine the zone of equipoise for the Proximal FEmur Resection or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) randomized controlled trial.

Jessa Fogel, Vincent Y Ng, Thomas Schubert, Jonathan Forsberg, R Lor Randall, Ricardo Becker, Carol Morris, Michelle Ghert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessa FogelUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. jfogel@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-7457
Vincent Y NgUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas SchubertUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Jonathan ForsbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
R Lor RandallUC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ricardo BeckerHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Carol MorrisMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Inpatient Hospital and Main Campus, New York City, NY, USA.
Michelle GhertUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
A Planning Grant for a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Hip Arthroplasty to Internal Fixation for Minimally Displaced Femoral Neck FracturesR34AR082550 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI O'HARA, NATHAN NOEL, SLOBOGEAN, GERARD · 2023 to 2024
$339k
A Planning Grant for a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction vs. Internal Fixation for Metastatic Bone Disease of the Proximal FemurR34AR084146 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GHERT, MICHELLE, O'HARA, NATHAN NOEL · 2024 to 2025
$297k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIAMS NIH HHS R34 AR082550NIAMS NIH HHS R34 AR084146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to establish a zone of clinical equipoise for the Proximal FEmur Resection or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) randomized controlled trial, which will compare resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction to internal fixation for skeletal metastases of the proximal femur.

methodsA survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to self-declared interested stakeholders in the PERFORM trial. The survey targeted orthopedic oncologists and was designed to assess patient and bone lesion characteristics that drive surgical decision-making in the treatment of skeletal metastases in the proximal femur. An Ethics Waiver was obtained at the lead academic institution and data was collected in the REDCap survey database.

resultsResponses were complete from 76 surgeons across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Response rate from self-declared interested stakeholders was 70%, with additional responses collected from a broader international audience. Responses indicate that a study population for which either resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction or internal fixation are acceptable options include (1) life expectancy at least 6 months, (2) bone loss of no more than 75% and no less than 25%, and (3) minimal to moderate risk for perioperative complications. Ninety-three percent of respondents indicated that they would be interested in participating in the PERFORM trial.

conclusionA preliminary zone of equipoise for the PERFORM trial includes patients with 25-75% bone loss, low to moderate risk of operative complications, and life expectancy of at least 6 months. Further stakeholder discussions have finalized the PERFORM trial protocol prior to study initiation.

Indexed as

Femoral NeoplasmsTherapeutic EquipoiseClinical Decision-MakingFemurFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOsteotomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeMetastatic bone diseaseOrthopedic oncologyPERFORMProximal femurSurvey

Identifiers

PMID39533439
PMCPMC11558838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.