Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533438›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024

Predictors of weaning failure in ventilated intensive care patients: a systematic evidence map.

Fritz Sterr, Michael Reintke, Lydia Bauernfeind, Volkan Senyol, Christian Rester, Sabine Metzing, Rebecca Palm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fritz SterrFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany. fritz.sterr@uni-wh.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-319X
Michael ReintkeFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-8744-3938
Lydia BauernfeindFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-3227-7772
Volkan SenyolDepartment for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
Christian ResterFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-7954
Sabine MetzingFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4466-5672
Rebecca PalmFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Sciences, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-8413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator weaning is of great importance for intensive care patients in order to avoid complications caused by prolonged ventilation. However, not all patients succeed in weaning immediately. Their spontaneous breathing may be insufficient, resulting in extubation failure and the subsequent need for reintubation. To identify patients at high risk for weaning failure, a variety of potential predictors has already been examined in individual studies and meta-analyses over the last decades. However, an overview of all the predictors investigated is missing.

aimTo provide an overview of empirically investigated predictors for weaning failure.

methodsA systematic evidence map was developed. To this end, we conducted a systematic search in the Medline, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases in December 2023 and added a citation search and a manual search in June 2024. Studies on predictors for weaning failure in adults ventilated in the intensive care unit were included. Studies on children, outpatients, non-invasive ventilation, or explanatory factors of weaning failure were excluded. Two reviewers performed the screening and data extraction independently. Data synthesis followed an inductive approach in which the predictors were thematically analyzed, sorted, and clustered.

resultsOf the 1388 records obtained, 140 studies were included in the analysis. The 112 prospective and 28 retrospective studies investigated a total of 145 predictors. These were assigned to the four central clusters 'Imaging procedures' (n = 22), 'Physiological parameters' (n = 61), 'Scores and indices' (n = 53), and 'Machine learning models' (n = 9). The most frequently investigated predictors are the rapid shallow breathing index, the diaphragm thickening fraction, the respiratory rate, the P/F ratio, and the diaphragm excursion.

conclusionPredictors for weaning failure are widely researched. To date, 145 predictors have been investigated with varying intensity in 140 studies that are in line with the current weaning definition. It is no longer just individual predictors that are investigated, but more comprehensive assessments, indices and machine learning models in the last decade. Future research should be conducted in line with international weaning definitions and further investigate poorly researched predictors. Registration, Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KDYU.

Indexed as

Ventilator WeaningHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialEvidence mapExtubation failureIntensive care unitMechanical ventilationPredictorReviewSBT failureWeaning failure

Identifiers

PMID39533438
PMCPMC11556093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.