Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533437›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Thibang Diphatlha: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial designed to increase timely adoption of cervical cancer treatment in Botswana.

Katharine A Rendle, Doreen Ramogola-Masire, Surbhi Grover, Thibang Diphatlha Collective

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05952141 (Thibang Diphatlha), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05952141 narecruitingnot on this map

Thibang Diphatlha: Testing Adaptive Strategies to Close the Gap From Cervical Cancer Diagnosis to Treatment in Botswana

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2023 to 2027Enrolled610ConditionsCervical CancerArmsClinic Outreach, Enhanced Outreach, Low-Touch Strategy, High-Touch Strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharine A RendleDepartment of Family Medicine & Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. katharine.rendle@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-8728
Doreen Ramogola-MasireDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Surbhi GroverPenn Center for Cancer Care Innovation (PC3I), Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thibang Diphatlha Collective

Funding

Thibang Diphatlha: Testing adaptive strategies to close the gap from cervical cancer diagnosis to treatment in BotswanaU01CA275032 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Surbhi Grover, Katharine A. Rendle · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
Prognostic value of quantitative HPV viral load in determining cervical cancer treatment response and recurrenceK08CA230170 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GROVER, SURBHI · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA230170NCI NIH HHS U01 CA275032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelays and missed opportunities for timely treatment contribute significantly to stark inequities in cervical cancer mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to high-income countries. The vast majority (approximately 90%) of new cases and deaths occur in LMICs, particularly those with high rates of HIV such as Botswana. To date, most of the implementation and cancer control research in Botswana and other LMICs has focused on cancer prevention and screening, with limited focus on cancer treatment. As such, there is a critical need to identify effective strategies to ensure timely care, and to understand contextual factors that shape the response to strategies. Without this fundamental knowledge, cervical cancer will remain a public health crisis in Botswana and other LMICs.

methodsTo help fill this known gap, this study tests the effectiveness of adaptive strategies on timely treatment adoption using a hybrid (type III) Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design and evaluate contextual mechanisms contributing to the success or failure of each adaptive strategy. The adaptive strategies are designed to target contextual determinants identified in our prior work, including delayed communication of results to patients, individual and structural barriers to accessing treatment, and suboptimal care coordination between referring and cancer treatment clinics, and are supported by systematic evidence of the effectiveness of nudge strategies in clinical care. The primary implementation outcome is adoption, defined as the initiation of treatment within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include fidelity, reach, acceptability, implementation costs, and cancer and HIV-related clinical outcomes. The rationale for the study is that enhancing coordination, communication, and navigation through centralized outreach will both increase timely treatment adoption and be scalable and sustainable after the project is completed. DISCUSSION: This innovative study seeks to decrease cervical cancer mortality in LMICs by developing and implementing effective and sustainable strategies that can be sustained and adapted to other contexts. Additionally, this study seeks to advance the long-term impact of global implementation science through strong and sustained partnerships in Botswana and other LMICs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05952141. Registered on July 11, 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05952141 PROTOCOL VERSION AND DATE: Version 1 (September 28, 2024).

Indexed as

Cancer careCervical cancerGlobal health inequitiesImplementation sciencePragmatic trials

Identifiers

PMID39533437
PMCPMC11559231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.