Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533433›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2024

Phase angle and body composition in long-term type 1 diabetes in adults: a comparative study in a Brazilian public reference outpatient clinic.

Natália Fenner-Pena, Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo, Lívia Froes, Paulo Augusto Miranda Carvalho, Fábio Vasconcellos Comim, Viviane Sahade, Márcio Weissheimer Lauria, Henrique Oswaldo da Gama Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Obesity paradox in individuals with type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natália Fenner-PenaDiabetes Academic League-Borges da Costa Ambulatory, Type 1 Diabetes Section or Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. natalia.fennerp@gmail.com.
Virgínia Capistrano FajardoProgram in Sciences Applied to Adult Health, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lívia FroesDiabetes Academic League-Borges da Costa Ambulatory, Type 1 Diabetes Section or Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paulo Augusto Miranda CarvalhoEndocrinologist at Clinic of Endocrinology and Metabology - Santa Casa, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fábio Vasconcellos ComimDiabetes Academic League-Borges da Costa Ambulatory, Type 1 Diabetes Section or Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Viviane SahadeFederal University of Bahia-UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Márcio Weissheimer LauriaDiabetes Academic League-Borges da Costa Ambulatory, Type 1 Diabetes Section or Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Henrique Oswaldo da Gama TorresDiabetes Academic League-Borges da Costa Ambulatory, Type 1 Diabetes Section or Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionType 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM1) affects a small percentage of the population. Nevertheless, its prevalence is currently growing with alarming data on uncontrolled cases. The importance of body composition and Phase Angle (PA), assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance (BIA), in long- term DM1 patients lies in the fact that alterations in cellular integrity and body compartments may affect risk profiles and metabolic control. The objective of this study was to compare PA and body composition parameters between adults with DM1 and healthy controls.

methodsA comparative study was carried out in a public university outpatient clinic including a cohort of adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with DM1 and healthy controls matched by age and sex in a 2:1 ratio. Anthropometric measurements included weight, height and BMI. Using the raw BIA data of Resistance and Reactance, fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), fat-free mass index (FFMI), fat mass index (FMI), PA and standardized PA (SPA) were calculated. Means or medians were compared between the groups. Regression models were used to identify distinguishing characteristics of the groups and associations within the DM1 group (i.e. glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), disease duration, presence of microvascular complications, capillary blood glucose, BMI and FMI).

results88 patients with DM1and 46 healthy controls were evaluated. PA (6.05 vs. 6.85, p = 0.000) and SPA (-1.47 vs. -0,37, p = 0.000) were lower in patients with DM1 compared to healthy controls. People with DM1 displayed higher adiposity (%FM = 29.6 vs. 27.6, p = 0.016; FMI = 7.00 vs. 6.33, p = 0.016) and lower %FFM compared to healthy controls. Most of the differences were maintained after sex stratification; however, men with DM1 showed a lower FFMI than male controls (18.2 vs. 20.16, p = 0.029).

conclusionPatients with DM1 present lower PA than healthy controls, which may be related to worse cell membrane integrity. Significant body composition differences between the groups and between sexes were identified, with data showing greater adiposity in women with DM1 and men displaying lower muscle mass. These findings suggest the importance of including PA and body composition evaluations in the follow-up of patients with DM1. The ultimate goal is to obtain a better metabolic control and, consequently, a better prognosis.

Indexed as

BioimpedanceBody compositionPhase angleType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39533433
PMCPMC11559135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.