ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Decompression and reconstruction the spinal TB lesion of a single vertebra through thoracoscopy alone or combined with foraminal endoscopy.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Short-term effectiveness of anterior and middle columns repair and reconstruction with whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone through posterior approach in thoracolumbar tuberculosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy combined with transforaminal endoscopy and thoracoscopy alone in the treatment of thoracic tuberculosis.
methodsPatients with thoracic tuberculosis who visited our hospital from February 2018 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into thoracoscopic combined transforaminal endoscopic surgery group (group A) and thoracoscopic surgery alone group (group B) according to the surgical methods. Surgery-related information, VAS score, ODI score, degree of spinal cord function improvement, fusion time, and progression of kyphotic deformity were compared.
resultsA total of 37 patients were included, 16 in group A and 21 in group B. Postoperative follow-up time was 10-48 months, with an average of 28.62 ± 10.53 months. All patients had significant improvement in chest and back pain and spinal cord function after the operation. There were statistical differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence rate of complications, and JOA score at 1 week and 3 months after operation between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS, ODI score, kyphotic angle correction, kyphotic correction loss angle, postoperative drainage volume, and fusion time between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients had no recurrence of thoracic tuberculosis during follow-up.
conclusionThoracoscopy combined with transforaminal endoscopy produce equivalent long-term results with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less complications and higher surgical safety comparing to thoracoscopy alone. And thoracoscopy combined with transforaminal endoscopy can fully decompress and facilitate the early recovery of spinal cord function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.