ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
A
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning model for the prediction of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using MIP FDG-PET images: a retrospective validation study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- A Weighted Neural Network Model Based on Laboratory Tests for Identifying Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Machine learning applications in the detection and treatment of esophageal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Recent advances, comparative performance, and data requirements of artificial intelligence-assisted technologies for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Hybrid Approach Based on Muscle Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcriptome analysis and artificial intelligence for predicting lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Radiomics applications in the modern management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Tumor-lymph cross-plane projection reveals spatial relationship features: a ResNet-CBAM model for prognostic prediction in esophageal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model using Radiomics, deep learning (DL) features extracted from
methodsThe study included 300 ESCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University who were divided into a training cohort and an internal testing cohort with an 8:2 ratio. Another 111 patients from Shanghai Chest Hospital were included as the external cohort. For each sample, we extracted 428 PET/CT-based Radiomics features from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and cervical lymph node (CLN) delineated layer by layer and 256 PET/CT-based DL features from the maximum cross-section of GTV and CLN images We input these features into seven different machine learning algorithms and ultimately selected logistic regression (LR) as the model classifier. Subsequently, we evaluated seven models (Clinical, Radiomics, Radiomics-Clinical, DL-Clinical, DL-Radiomics, DL-Radiomics-Clinical) using Radiomics features, DL features and clinical feature.
resultsThe DL-Radiomics-Clinical (DRC) model demonstrated higher AUC of 0.955 and 0.916 compared to the other six models in both internal and external testing cohorts respectively. The DRC model achieved the highest accuracy among the seven models in both the internal and external test sets, with scores of 0.951 and 0.892, respectively.
conclusionsThrough the combination of Radiomics features and DL features from PET/CT imaging and clinical feature, we developed a predictive model exhibiting exceptional classification capabilities. This model can be considered as a non-invasive method for predication of CLNM in patients with ESCC. It might facilitate decision-making regarding to the extend of lymph node dissection, and to select candidates for postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.