Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533367›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

From pilot to national roll-out of the improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) in Tanzania: lessons learnt and way forward.

Ntuli A Kapologwe, Boniphace Marwa, Heri Marwa, Ally Kebby, James Tumaini Kengia, George Ruhago, Stephen M Kibusi, Innocent B Mboya, Gemini Mtei, Albino Kalolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ntuli A KapologweDepartment of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services, President's Office Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG), P.O. Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Boniphace MarwaRegional Medical Officer, Simiyu, Bariadi, Tanzania.
Heri MarwaPharmAccess Foundation Tanzania, P.O. Box 635, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ally KebbyHealth Promotion and System Strengthening (HPSS) Project, Dodoma, Tanzania.
James Tumaini KengiaDepartment of Health, Social Welfare and Nutrition Services, President's Office Regional Administration and Local Government (PORALG), P.O. Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania.
George RuhagoDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65454, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Stephen M KibusiThe Department of Public Health, The University of Dodoma, P.O. Box 259, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Innocent B MboyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, P.O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania.
Gemini MteiUSAID-PS3+, Abt Associates Inc., Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Albino KaloloDepartment of Public Health, St Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, Ifakara, Tanzania. kaloloa@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScaling up public health interventions in the health systems of resource poor settings come with technical and operational challenges. Little is documented on scaling up complex health financing interventions and their related outcomes, especially the voluntary health insurance schemes. This study aimed to analyse the scale-up steps, successes and challenges of the improved community health fund (iCHF), a voluntary health insurance scheme in Tanzania,

methodsIn this paper, guided by the Expand Net framework (a scale-up framework for health system interventions), we present a systematic analysis of countrywide scale-up of the iCHF that started in 2019 and implemented in partnership between the government and development partners. We systematically collected information on the scale-up steps and the success and challenges. The collected data was analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsThe scale-up involved multiple steps and actions at different levels of the health system. The initial step involved gathering stakeholders' views on scale-up options and strategies. The subsequent steps focused on mobilizing resources for scale-up, advocacy and promotion of the scheme through media, community leaders and role models, capacity building to implementing organs, institutionalizing the scale-up processes, intensifying the scale-upscale-up activities for expansion and spontaneous scale-up and technical backstopping to lower levels of the health system on the scale-up process. We found success and challenges as the scale-upscale-up progressed to mature stages. The success included acceptability and institutionalization of the scale-up activities and growing enrolments and funds in the scheme. The challenges included: the costs to sustaining advocacy and enrolments, equity in scale-upscale-up activities across regions, relying on top-down scale-upscale-up approaches, influence of contextual factors and lack of implementation research alongside the scale-upscale-up process.

conclusionThis paper underscores the scale up steps and success and challenges of scaling-up a voluntary health insurance scheme in a resource-constrained health system. Sustaining the scale-upscale-up gains will require utilizing program data and experiences to sustainably improve the scheme performance while also harnessing support from stakeholders. Further research is needed to assess equity and quality of outcomes of the scale up.

Indexed as

ExpandNet frameworkImplementation success and challengesScaling upTanzaniaVoluntary health insurance scheme

Identifiers

PMID39533367
PMCPMC11556162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.