ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2024
False-positive XXY results by interphase FISH in cytogenetically normal XX individuals: two cases highlighting the necessity of additional laboratory follow-up.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is commonly used for rapid aneuploidy detection in clinical settings. While FISH-based aneuploidy detection provides rapid results desirable for patient management, it usually only utilizes one probe per chromosome, which may lead to rare false-positive findings. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report two interphase FISH results, which were false-positive for XXY in cytogenetically normal XX individuals. Both false-positive cases were due to hybridization of the Y chromosome centromeric probe DYZ3 to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 15. In both cases, chromosomal microarray revealed no detectable Y chromosome material, suggesting the hybridizations of the DYZ3 probe to chromosome 15 likely represent benign heterochromatic variants of no clinical significance. In one case, the DYZ3 hybridization was also identified in the phenotypically unaffected mother, further suggesting this is likely a rare variant of no clinical significance.
conclusionsThis report marks the first documentation of hybridization of the DYZ3 probe to another chromosome in cytogenetically normal individuals. Our report has important clinical implications, because DYZ3 is widely used by clinical laboratories for Y chromosome detection. Our findings underscore the necessity of confirming abnormal aneuploidy detection FISH results with additional laboratory methods such as chromosomal microarray analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.