Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2024
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04169373 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Program to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adult Subjects With Axial Spondyloarthritis Followed by a Remission-Withdrawal Period), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Program to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adult Subjects With Axial Spondyloarthritis Followed by a Remission-Withdrawal Period
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of acupuncture in the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with insights.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Upadacitinib in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year data from the phase 3 SELECT-AXIS 2 study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Therapeutics in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Review of What Works - SPARTAN 2026 Annual Meeting Proceedings.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- Korean College of Rheumatology treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 2026 update.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- Interferon-JAK-STAT Axis in Bone Metabolism.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Current and Emerging Therapies for Uveitis in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Scoping Review.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Year in Review: Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Short-Term Metabolic and Inflammatory Effects of Upadacitinib in Biologic-Refractory Spondyloarthritis: Real-World Evidence on Lipid Paradox and Safety.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Real-world clinical experience with upadacitinib in a cohort of Italian patients with axial spondyloarthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Biologic and targeted synthetic therapies in ankylosing spondylitis: a pharmacological review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The Th17/Treg axis: a key to understanding and treating autoimmune disorders.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique for the treatment of infectious spondylitis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- JAK inhibition and axial spondyloarthritis: new steps on the path to understanding pathophysiology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Case Report: The combination of upadacitinib and adalimumab in the treatment of refractory ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inadequate response/intolerance to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) were evaluated through 1 year in the SELECT-AXIS 2 study. Here, we assess 2-year efficacy, safety, and imaging outcomes in SELECT-AXIS 2.
methodsPatients who received continuous upadacitinib, and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 14, could enter the open-label extension (OLE). Efficacy endpoints included Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses, and changes from baseline in measures of disease activity, back pain, function, and quality of life. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). As observed (AO) and AO with non-responder imputation (AO-NRI) analyses were used for binary endpoints; AO with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (AO-MMRM) for continuous endpoints; and AO-analysis of covariance for mSASSS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients receiving ≥ 1 upadacitinib dose through week 104 are presented as events (E)/100 patient-years (PY). Subgroup analyses were performed by prior tumor necrosis factor/interleukin-17 inhibitor exposure and bDMARD lack of efficacy/intolerance.
resultsOf 420 patients who entered the bDMARD-IR AS study, 409 entered the OLE, and 331 (continuous upadacitinib, n = 163; placebo to upadacitinib, n = 168) completed week 104. Improvements in efficacy measures were sustained through the OLE, with similar response rates between the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups at week 104. At week 104, 64.9% and 61.7% of patients, respectively, had achieved ASAS 40% response (AO-NRI). Mean changes from baseline were similar between the two groups at week 104 across measures (ASDAS: -2.1 and -2.0; total back pain: -4.9 and -4.6, respectively; AO-MMRM). Over 93.0% of patients showed no radiographic progression (mSASSS mean change from baseline < 2) at week 104. The overall TEAE rate was 165.2 E/100 PY, with low rates of major adverse cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events (0.3 E/100 PY each).
conclusionsUpadacitinib efficacy, including very low rates of radiographic progression, was demonstrated through 104 weeks in treatment-refractory patients with active AS. Treatment was well tolerated, with no newly identified safety signals.
trial registrationNCT04169373.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.