Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533349›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2024

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.

Xenofon Baraliakos, Désirée van der Heijde, Joachim Sieper, Robert Davies Inman, Hideto Kameda, Walter Peter Maksymowych, Ivan Lagunes-Galindo, Xianwei Bu, Peter Wung, Koji Kato and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04169373 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Program to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adult Subjects With Axial Spondyloarthritis Followed by a Remission-Withdrawal Period), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04169373 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Program to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adult Subjects With Axial Spondyloarthritis Followed by a Remission-Withdrawal Period

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2019 to 2025Enrolled734ConditionsSpondyloarthritisArmsUpadacitinib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interferon-JAK-STAT Axis in Bone Metabolism.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Year in Review: Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Nordrhein- Westfalen, Germany. xenofon.baraliakos@elisabethgruppe.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-9362
Désirée van der HeijdeRheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joachim SieperGastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Robert Davies InmanSchroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hideto KamedaRheumatology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
Walter Peter MaksymowychDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ivan Lagunes-GalindoImmunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Xianwei BuImmunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Peter WungImmunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Koji KatoImmunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Anna ShmagelImmunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Atul DeodharDivision of Arthritis & Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inadequate response/intolerance to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) were evaluated through 1 year in the SELECT-AXIS 2 study. Here, we assess 2-year efficacy, safety, and imaging outcomes in SELECT-AXIS 2.

methodsPatients who received continuous upadacitinib, and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 14, could enter the open-label extension (OLE). Efficacy endpoints included Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses, and changes from baseline in measures of disease activity, back pain, function, and quality of life. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). As observed (AO) and AO with non-responder imputation (AO-NRI) analyses were used for binary endpoints; AO with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (AO-MMRM) for continuous endpoints; and AO-analysis of covariance for mSASSS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients receiving ≥ 1 upadacitinib dose through week 104 are presented as events (E)/100 patient-years (PY). Subgroup analyses were performed by prior tumor necrosis factor/interleukin-17 inhibitor exposure and bDMARD lack of efficacy/intolerance.

resultsOf 420 patients who entered the bDMARD-IR AS study, 409 entered the OLE, and 331 (continuous upadacitinib, n = 163; placebo to upadacitinib, n = 168) completed week 104. Improvements in efficacy measures were sustained through the OLE, with similar response rates between the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups at week 104. At week 104, 64.9% and 61.7% of patients, respectively, had achieved ASAS 40% response (AO-NRI). Mean changes from baseline were similar between the two groups at week 104 across measures (ASDAS: -2.1 and -2.0; total back pain: -4.9 and -4.6, respectively; AO-MMRM). Over 93.0% of patients showed no radiographic progression (mSASSS mean change from baseline < 2) at week 104. The overall TEAE rate was 165.2 E/100 PY, with low rates of major adverse cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events (0.3 E/100 PY each).

conclusionsUpadacitinib efficacy, including very low rates of radiographic progression, was demonstrated through 104 weeks in treatment-refractory patients with active AS. Treatment was well tolerated, with no newly identified safety signals.

trial registrationNCT04169373.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingSpondylitis, AnkylosingAdultBiological ProductsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingupadacitinibAnkylosing spondylitisBiologic DMARDInadequate responseOpen-label extensionRadiographic axial spondyloarthritisRefractoryUpadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID39533349
PMCPMC11556075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.