ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Effect of remimazolam toluene sulfonate on the cognitive function of juveniles and its mechanism of action.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Remimazolam vs propofol for postoperative delirium in adults undergoing general anesthesia: A meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Effects of Remimazolam Tosylate on Postoperative Memory Function in Young and Middle-Aged Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Cognitive Deterioration Between Propofol and Remimazolam Anesthesia in ApoE4 Knock-In Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- From neurotoxicity to neuroprotection: Rethinking GABACell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Remimazolam in pediatric ambulatory anesthesia: a critical review and clinical perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine. Currently, it remains unclear how repeated exposure to remimazolam affects the cognitive function of the developing brain. In the present study, the equivalent doses of the two sedatives were derived from S-shaped dose-response curves, and the ED95 of remimazolam was 45 mg/kg (95% CI 37.579-79.280), and for midazolam, it was 77 mg/kg (95% CI 63.751-127.21) using probability analysis. Then, we evaluated the effects of remimazolam and midazolam on cognitive function in juvenile mice (C57BL/6) through Y-maze and MWM. TUNEL staining was used to observe the apoptosis of neurons in hippocampus, western blotting was used to detect the expression changes of related proteins, and the changes of LTP were observed by recording the activity of neurons through electrical stimulation. We found that there was no significant difference in the behavior of mice in MWM. However, the short-term memory of developing mice was impaired in Y-maze after repeated exposure to remimazolam and midazolam. Furthermore, our data demonstrated that the short-term memory damage caused by remimazolam is lighter than midazolam. Concurrently, the extent of caspase-3 upregulation, the number of neuronal apoptosis in CA1 and CA3 regions, a downward trend of PSD95 and BDNF in the hippocampus, and the inhibition of LTP were highly consistent with the behavior of short-term memory impairment. These results indicate that the degree of memory impairment caused by remimazolam is milder than that caused by midazolam, making it a potential replacement for midazolam in repeated medication and long-term sedation in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.