Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533306›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

Perception of caregivers on ITNs utilisation and its effectiveness among children under 5 years of age in Chikwawa district, Malawi.

Enock Benito, Praveen Suthar, Godfrey Banda, Parthasarthi Ganguly, Wamaka Msopole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enock BenitoParul Institute of Public Health, Parul University, P.O. Box. Limda, 391760, Waghodia, Gujarat, India. enockbenito@gmail.com.
Praveen Suthar *Parul Institute of Public Health, Parul University, P.O. Box. Limda, 391760, Waghodia, Gujarat, India.
Godfrey Banda *School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu College of Health Sciences, P.V.T Bag 360, Chichiri Blantyre, Malawi.
Parthasarthi GangulyParul Institute of Public Health, Parul University, P.O. Box. Limda, 391760, Waghodia, Gujarat, India.
Wamaka MsopoleChikwawa District Hospital, P.O. Box 32, Chikwawa, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, Malawi had 6.9 million malaria cases and 2551 deaths, mainly in children under five years of age. The 2017-2022 Malawi malaria control strategic plan promoted the consistent use of insecticide-treated nets through free distribution and mass campaigns. Despite widespread availability of the control strategy plan, Chikwawa District continues to suffer from high malaria burden especially among under five children, due to inconsistent insecticide-treated (ITN) net usage. For this reason, this study aimed at exploring caregivers' perceptions on insecticide-treated net utilisation and also find out about its effectiveness among those who consistently use them.

methodsThis study used a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. The data used for quantitative analysis was drawn from the population of under-five children's caregivers within the catchment area of Chikwawa district hospital. The sample size was 96 participants, as determined by Cochran's formula. The data collection lasted from December 2023 to April 2024 and included four in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions to address the objectives qualitatively.

resultsThe study revealed that 91.67% of households used ITNs, with 87.50% using them daily. The significant factors influencing ITN utilisation included the number of nets, user satisfaction, perceived impact, user habits, acquisition method, and usage frequency (all p values < 0.001). Under-five malaria cases were also significant (p = 0.025). The odds of the perceived net impact influencing utilisation were 4.956 times greater. Non-usage was due to heat, quality concerns, limited access, breathing difficulties, health conditions such as asthma, and misconceptions about net treatment.

conclusionThe study revealed a strong belief in insecticide-treated net efficacy. However, some challenges such as access, durability, and misinformation of insecticide-treated nets were discovered. These challenges affected utilisation of insecticide-treated nets in agreement with some literature reviewed. The insights found in this study will help policymakers in addressing health interventions for the reduction of malaria cases in Malawi.

Indexed as

CaregiversInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalawiMaleMosquito ControlPerceptionYoung AdultAccess to ITNsCaregiversInsecticide-treated nets (ITNs)MalariaUtilisation

Identifiers

PMID39533306
PMCPMC11556166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.