ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Optimal angles for independent femoral tunnel drillings to prevent damage to anatomic structures in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the optimal angles for independent femoral tunnel drillings in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in different races and genders with the aim of preventing damage to lateral femoral anatomic structures (LFAS), posterior cortex and medial femoral condyle.
methodsThis study included 180 volunteers, including 90 Caucasian and 90 matched Chinese. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to scan the knees to create three-dimensional bone models, the ACL femoral footprint centre and the LFAS. In each femur model, femoral tunnels were established using a set of 16 distinct angular combinations: 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° in the axial plane, as well as 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° in the coronal plane. The minimum distance from the tunnel exit to the LFAS was evaluated, and the tunnel length, posterior cortex damage and medial femoral condyle injury were assessed.
resultsAmong the 180 patients with simulated ACL femoral tunnels, there was damage to the anatomical structure in parts of the model. According to the Cochran Q test results (P < 0.001), the percentage of safe tunnels varied significantly among the 16 different drilling angle combinations. The overall occurrence of the tunnel exit causing injury to LFAS were 8.3% and 8.1% in Chinese and Caucasian groups (P = 0.786). The means for tunnel length in Caucasians was 40.1 ± 7.9 mm, respectively; for Chinese, the results was 38.8 ± 6.6 mm (P < 0.001). Females had significantly shorter femoral tunnels than males in both Chinese and Caucasian (P < 0.001). The overall invasion rate of the posterior cortex and medial femoral condyle were 32.6% and 7.4% for Chinese; 31.0% and 7.4% for Caucasians, respectively.
conclusionTo reduce risks of injury to anatomical structures, such as the LFAS, posterior cortex and medial femoral condyle, specific angle combinations of 30°/45°, 45°/30°, 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45° and 60°/60° should be used when creating the femoral tunnel in single-bundle ACLR. The selected drilling angles are critical for optimizing femoral tunnel placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.