Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533271›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2024

Suicide prevention via telemental health services: insights from a randomized control trial of crisis response plan and self-guided safety planning approaches.

Monika Lohani, Justin C Baker, Jamie S Elsey, Sam Dutton, Samuel P Findley, Scott A Langenecker, Amy S Do, Craig J Bryan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04888845 (Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04888845 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2021 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsStructured Interview, Narrative Assessment, Safety Plan, Crisis Response PlanArmsSafety Plan, Crisis Response Plan, Structured interview, Narrative Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monika LohaniDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. monika.lohani@utah.edu.
Justin C BakerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Jamie S ElseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Sam DuttonDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Samuel P FindleyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Scott A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Amy S DoDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Craig J BryanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough telemental health can make suicide prevention treatments more scalable and accessible, limited evidence demonstrates successful reductions in suicidality when interventions are administered through telehealth platforms. To address this limitation, the current work investigated the effects of two suicide prevention treatments - a clinician-guided Crisis Response Plan and a self-guided Safety Planning approach.

methodsAfter completing the screening process, 82 participants with high suicide ideation and/or a lifetime history of suicidal behavior were randomly assigned across the two groups. Trained research clinicians administered the interventions using a videoconferencing platform. After the intervention delivery was complete, participants reported the therapeutic alliance they experienced with their clinician using an online survey. Participants also reported their overall suicidality 45 days after receiving the intervention. In addition, participants' perceived usefulness of the received intervention and actual use of the plan were recorded. Linear and logistic regression models predicted how suicidality, perceived utility, and actual use of their intervention protocols varied depending on the high (Crisis Response Plan) versus low (self-guided Safety Planning) level of clinician-led collaboration the two treatments entailed.

resultsBoth Crisis Response Plan and self-guided Safety Planning were found to lower suicidality after receiving them via telehealth services. At the same time, those who received the Crisis Response Plan (the more collaborative form of therapy) reported experiencing a stronger therapeutic alliance with the clinician, utilizing the plan more often and perceiving it as more useful. These findings demonstrate the additional benefits of adopting a more collaborative approach because of its effectiveness and perceived utility, which has implications for suicide-related distress reduction in the short and long term.

conclusionsEvidence from this randomized control trial suggests that Crisis Response Plan is a suitable candidate for delivering suicide prevention via telehealth platform because of its effectiveness in reducing suicidality and its collaborative approach to building a strong therapeutic alliance, perceived usefulness, and actual utility in everyday life.

trial registrationThis paper was part of a registered RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04888845 . Registration date: Date: 2021-04-22.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionSuicide PreventionTelemedicineAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental Health TeletherapyMiddle AgedSuicidal IdeationCrisis Response PlanSelf-guided Safety PlanningTelemental health intervention

Identifiers

PMID39533271
PMCPMC11559151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.