Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533246›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Characteristic of mental health app usage: a cross-sectional survey in the general population.

Sophia Fürtjes, Elisabeth Gebel, Hanna Kische, Katja Beesdo-Baum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophia FürtjesTUD Dresden University of Technology, Behavioral Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chemnitzer Straße 46, D-01187, Dresden, Germany. Sophia.Fuertjes@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5460-8511
Elisabeth GebelTUD Dresden University of Technology, Behavioral Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chemnitzer Straße 46, D-01187, Dresden, Germany.
Hanna KischeTUD Dresden University of Technology, Behavioral Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chemnitzer Straße 46, D-01187, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-7346
Katja Beesdo-BaumTUD Dresden University of Technology, Behavioral Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chemnitzer Straße 46, D-01187, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health apps (MHA) have gained popularity in recent years. Most freely available apps are of low quality and lack evidence for effectiveness. Yet, download rates indicate high usage. MHA are potentially beneficial for individuals with no/low symptom severity as prevention, or as an option to reach underserviced populations. However, currently very little is known about the characteristics of MHA users in the general population, about the kind of MHA used, or the motivation behind MHA usage.

methodsWe collected survey-data from N = 1,247 individuals from the general population to investigate MHA usage.

resultsDescriptive statistics revealed that 41% had used MHA in the past 12 months; prescription app-use however was low (1.5% of MHA users). Mindfulness, moodtracking, and relaxation were the most popular categories of MHA. Perceived helpfulness, fun, and availability were the top reasons for MHA usage. Non-users reported distrust, lack of perceived need, and data security concerns as usage barriers. MHA users and non-users did not differ regarding sociodemographic variables. Multiple regression analyses revealed that sub-threshold symptoms of psychological disorders as well as higher levels of anxiety and stress were linked to higher probability of MHA usage. Higher levels of depression were associated with lower likelihood of MHA usage in general, but increased likelihood of usage of self-help apps specifically for depression.

conclusionsIt follows that MHA use is common in the general population independent of sociodemographic characteristics. MHA can reach people who might benefit, but more awareness and better structure of the market is needed to reduce distrust, increase usage of high-quality MHA, and improve the fit between app and user.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultApp usageE-mental healthGeneral populationMental health appsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID39533246
PMCPMC11555976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.