ArticleBMC public health2024
Characteristic of mental health app usage: a cross-sectional survey in the general population.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital mental health apps for young people in Europe: A systematic cross-country analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Understanding University Students' Experiences of Engaging With AI and Apps for Their Mental Health and Well-Being: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Preliminary Evaluation of a Campus-Integrated Digital Platform (Fruto) for University Students' Mental Health Help-Seeking: Sequential Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health apps (MHA) have gained popularity in recent years. Most freely available apps are of low quality and lack evidence for effectiveness. Yet, download rates indicate high usage. MHA are potentially beneficial for individuals with no/low symptom severity as prevention, or as an option to reach underserviced populations. However, currently very little is known about the characteristics of MHA users in the general population, about the kind of MHA used, or the motivation behind MHA usage.
methodsWe collected survey-data from N = 1,247 individuals from the general population to investigate MHA usage.
resultsDescriptive statistics revealed that 41% had used MHA in the past 12 months; prescription app-use however was low (1.5% of MHA users). Mindfulness, moodtracking, and relaxation were the most popular categories of MHA. Perceived helpfulness, fun, and availability were the top reasons for MHA usage. Non-users reported distrust, lack of perceived need, and data security concerns as usage barriers. MHA users and non-users did not differ regarding sociodemographic variables. Multiple regression analyses revealed that sub-threshold symptoms of psychological disorders as well as higher levels of anxiety and stress were linked to higher probability of MHA usage. Higher levels of depression were associated with lower likelihood of MHA usage in general, but increased likelihood of usage of self-help apps specifically for depression.
conclusionsIt follows that MHA use is common in the general population independent of sociodemographic characteristics. MHA can reach people who might benefit, but more awareness and better structure of the market is needed to reduce distrust, increase usage of high-quality MHA, and improve the fit between app and user.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.