ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Application of a double-balloon method to remove button battery at the entrance of esophagus in a 17-month-old child: a case report.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince children have strong desire for exploration and poor safety awareness, foreign body impaction in the digestive tract is one of the most common critical conditions in children. Due to the popularity of electronic products, button battery ingestion by mistake is also increasing in children. Button battery impaction in the esophagus can cause serious complications such as esophageal cauterization and perforation in a short time. Therefore, more active treatment strategies should be taken once button battery ingestion occurs. Surgical treatment is traumatic and prone to cause various complications, so removal of foreign body retained in the esophagus under endoscopy is the preferred strategy. CASE PRESENTATION: We introduced a new method to remove the button battery retained in the esophagus of a 17-month-old child. Soon after the patient arrived at the hospital, we actively arranged endoscopic surgery. After the gastroscope entered the esophageal inlet, we first cleaned up the esophageal residues, and then, the button battery was exposed. The surrounding esophageal mucosa showed a little cauterization-like damage. We tried to remove the foreign body using foreign body forceps first, but failed after repeated attempts. Then, we tried to use a disposable balloon to assist in dragging the foreign body, but because the patient was younger with narrower esophagus and the drag resistance of the foreign body was abnormally large, this method also did not work. Violent dragging may cause tearing and perforation of the esophagus. Hence, we used a columnar balloon to help expand the esophagus and successfully removed the button battery at the entrance of the esophagus. For this new method, the columnar balloon was used to expand the esophagus and the button battery was clamped with foreign body forceps, and then, the foreign body was dragged by a disposable stone removal balloon. Because two types of balloons were used, it was named double-balloon method.
conclusionsFor the foreign body retained in the esophagus of younger children, the double -balloon method is recommended when the foreign body cannot be removed by traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.