ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Enhancing image-based diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract diseases through deep learning with EfficientNet and advanced data augmentation techniques.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FT-MDNNMDs: early detection of breast cancer using fine-tuned multi-deep neural networks with TCGA and clinical image datasets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic Recognition and Prognostic Prediction of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using a Multi-Scale Deep Learning Framework: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Gastroenterological disease detection using transformer-based medical imaging for sustainable healthcare.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based classification of colonoscopic images using an attention-enhanced ConvNeXt V2 architecture.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Abnormality detection in nailfold capillary images using deep learning with EfficientNet and cascade transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection and diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract diseases, such as ulcerative colitis, polyps, and esophagitis, are crucial for timely treatment. Traditional imaging techniques often rely on manual interpretation, which is subject to variability and may lack precision. Current methodologies leverage conventional deep learning models that, while effective to an extent, often suffer from overfitting and generalization issues on medical image datasets due to the intricate and subtle variations in disease manifestations. These models typically do not fully utilize the potential of transfer learning or advanced data augmentation, leading to less-than-optimal performance, especially in diverse real-world scenarios where data variability is high. This study introduces a robust model using the EfficientNetB5 architecture combined with a sophisticated data augmentation strategy. The model is tailored for the high variability and intricate details present in gastrointestinal tract disease images. By integrating transfer learning with maximal pooling and extensive regularization, the model aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce overfitting. The proposed model achieved a test accuracy of 98.89%, surpassing traditional methods by incorporating advanced regularization and augmentation techniques. The application of horizontal flipping and dynamic scaling during training significantly improved the model's ability to generalize, evidenced by a low-test loss of 0.230 and high precision metrics across all classes. The proposed deep learning framework demonstrates superior performance in the automated classification of gastrointestinal diseases from image data. By addressing key limitations of existing models through innovative techniques, this study contributes to the enhancement of diagnostic processes in medical imaging, potentially leading to more accurate and timely disease interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.