Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533182›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Oral health inequities over time among older adults of different racial/ethnic backgrounds: a comparative decomposition analysis across Australia and the United States.

Lisa Jamieson, Bei Wu, Sergio Chrisopoulos, Liana Luzzi, Gloria Mejia, Xiangqun Ju

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa JamiesonAustralia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Bei WuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, USA.
Sergio ChrisopoulosAustralia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Liana LuzziAustralia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Gloria MejiaAustralia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Xiangqun JuAustralia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia. xiangqun.ju@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-3918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the prevalence of poor oral health among older populations in Australia and the United States is higher, the contribution of ethnicity status is unknown. We aimed to estimate the contribution of social inequalities in oral health among older populations in Australia and the United States.

methodsCross-sectional study design using data from Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH 2004-06 and 2017-18) and the United States' National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003-04 and 2011-16). Participants included in the analysis were aged 65 + years. Oaxaca-Blinder type decomposition analysis was used to assess the contribution of demographic (age, sex), socioeconomic position (educational attainment, household income) and dental behaviors (last dental visit) to changes in prevalence of edentulism and non-functional dentition, and mean number of missing teeth by ethnicity status over time in Australia and the United States.

resultsThe number of participants aged 65 + years who provided clinical and sociodemographic/dental behaviour data was 1043 and 1269 in NSAOH 2004-06 and 2017-18, and 1372 and 1328 in NHANES 2003-04 and 2011-16 respectively. The prevalence of edentulism was from 13 percent (NHANES 2011-16) to 28 percent (NSAOH 2004-06), while the prevalence of non-functional dentition was from 41 percent (NSAOH 2017-18 and NHANES 2011-16) to 61 percent (NHANES 2003-04). The mean number of missing teeth was from 11 (NSAOH 2017-18) to 18 (NHANES 2003-04). The prevalence of edentulism and non-functional dentition, and the mean number of missing teeth were higher among older Australians identifying as White and the opposite results were observed among older Americans identifying as Non-White. For older adults in Australia, risk factors with the greatest impact on oral health outcomes by ethnicity status were educational attainment and household income. For older adults in the United States, the most dominant risk factor for non-optimal oral health outcomes by ethnicity status was last dental visit.

conclusionsThere are important policy translation implications from our findings, as they indicate that social and structural systems in Australia and the United States operate differently in the context of oral health over time among culturally diverse older citizens. This information will help inform initiatives that both target effective oral health promotion for older, culturally-diverse populations and provide evidence for the distribution of resources in the public dental health setting for this age group and cultural demographic.

Indexed as

Oral HealthAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHealth InequitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRacial GroupsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesDecomposition analysisEdentulismMissing teethOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID39533182
PMCPMC11556126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.