ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
Automated Hematoma Detection and Outcome Prediction in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury based on brain CT scans: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- A novel CT-based edema grading system combined with machine learning for precise prognostic prediction in traumatic brain injury.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Automatic classification and prognosis prediction of cerebral hemorrhage based on a deep learning model.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Machine learning-based triage model for elderly traumatic brain injury patients in Chinese emergency department.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a tool for automated subtype classification and segmentation of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) on CT scans of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Furthermore, outcome prediction for patients can effectively facilitate patient management.
methodsThis study presents a cascade framework for two-stage segmentation and multi-label classification. The hematoma region of interest (ROI) is localized, and then the ROI is cropped and resized to the original pixel size before being input into the model again to obtain the segmentation results. In multilabel classification, the mask obtained from automatic segmentation is superimposed onto the corresponding ROI and CT slices, respectively, to constitute the input image. Subsequently, the ROI image is employed as the local network input to obtain local features. Third, the CT image is utilized to construct a feature extraction network to obtain global features. Ultimately, the local and global features are fused dimensions in the pooling layer, and calculated to generate the final retrieval results. For the prediction of 14-day in-hospital mortality, automatically extracted hematoma subtype and volume features were integrated to enhance the widely used CRASH model.
resultsThe proposed segmentation method achieves the best estimates on the Dice similarity coefficient and Jaccard Similarity Index. The proposed multilabel classification method achieved an average accuracy of 95.91%. For mortality prediction, the best model achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 by 5-fold cross-validation.
conclusionsThe proposed method enhances the precision of hematoma segmentation and subtype classification. In clinical settings, the method can streamline the evaluation of ICH for radiologists, and the automatically extracted features are anticipated to facilitate prognosis assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.