ArticleCommunications biology2024
Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity in cephalic shape.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extinction drives both expansion and contraction of morphological disparity in trilobites.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity in cephalic shape.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trilobite cephalic shape disparity varied through geological time and was integral to their ecological niche diversity, and so is widely used for taxonomic assignments. To fully appreciate trilobite cephalic evolution, we must understand how this disparity varies and the factors responsible. We explore trilobite cephalic disparity using a dataset of 983 cephalon outlines of c. 520 species, analysing the associations between cephalic morphometry and taxonomic assignment and geological Period. Elliptical Fourier transformation visualised as a Principal Components Analysis suggests significant differences in morphospace occupation and in disparity measures between the groups. Cephalic shape disparity peaks in the Ordovician and Devonian. The Cambrian-Ordovician expansion of morphospace occupation reflects radiations to new niches, with all trilobite orders established by the late Ordovician. In comparison, the Silurian-Devonian expansion seems solely a result of within-niche diversification. Linear Discriminant Analyses cross-validation, average cephalon shapes, and centroid distances demonstrate that, except for Harpida and the Cambrian and Ordovician Periods, order and geological Period cannot be robustly predicted for an unknown trilobite. Further, k-means clustering analyses suggest the total dataset naturally subdivides into only seven groups that do not correspond with taxonomy, though k-means clusters do decrease in number through the Palaeozoic, aligning with findings of decreasing disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.