ArticleScientific reports2024
Pathomic and bioinformatics analysis of clinical-pathological and genomic factors for pancreatic cancer prognosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Dysregulated expression of cell cycle regulators CDC20, PLK1, BUB1, CDC45, CDCA5 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in Expression Regulation, Molecular Targeting Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Applications of the Let-7 MicroRNA Family in Gastric Cancer.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer exhibits a high degree of malignancy with a poor prognosis, lacking effective prognostic targets. Utilizing histopathological methodologies, this study endeavors to predict the expression of pathological features in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAAD) and investigate their underlying molecular mechanisms. Pathological images, transcriptomic, and clinical data from TCGA-PAAD were collected for survival analysis. Image segmentation using unsupervised machine learning was employed to extract features, perform clustering, and establish models. The prognostic value of pathological features and associated clinical risk factors were evaluated; the correlation between pathological features and molecular mechanisms, gene mutations, and immune infiltration was analyzed. By clustering 45 effective pathological features, we divided PAAD patients into two groups: cluster 1 and cluster 2. Significant associations with poor prognosis were found for cluster 2 in both the training group (n = 113) and validation group (n = 75) (p = 0.006), with pathological stages II-IV identified as potential synergistic risk factors (HR = 2.421, 95% CI = 1.263-4.639, p = 0.008). Subsequently, through multi-omics correlation analysis, we further revealed a close association between cluster 2 and the oxidative phosphorylation mechanism. Within the cluster 2 group, 28 oxidative phosphorylation genes exhibited reduced expression, CDKN2A gene mutations were upregulated, and there was significant downregulation of Tregs infiltration and related immune gene expression. The pathomic model constructed using machine learning serves as a valuable prognostic target for PAAD. The histopathological features cluster 2 are closely associated with the downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation levels and Tregs immune infiltration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.