ArticleScientific reports2024
Isovolumic relaxation intraventricular pressure difference predicts elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current guideline for evaluating diastolic function requires multiple parameters to identify patients with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). However, the intermediate result still exists and may cause LVEDP undetermined. Previous studies have shown intraventricular pressure difference (IVPDs) are required for normal LV filling, but the relationship between IVPDs and LVEDP is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between IVPDs and LVEDP in 54 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). LVEDP was prospectively measured at the time of coronary intervention and LVEDP > 15 mmHg was considered as elevated LV filling pressure. Simultaneous echocardiographic data was collected prior to the intervention. The relative intraventricular pressure was calculated using the vector flow mapping method. The IVPD was defined as the pressure difference from the apex to the base of LV. From 54 patients presenting with CAD, elevated LVEDP occurred in 30(55.6%). To analyze the changing trend of IVPD with LVEDP, CAD patients were further divided into group I with normal LVEDP (12.7 ± 3.1 mmHg) and group II with elevated LVEDP (26.0 ± 7.2 mmHg). In early diastole, both isovolumic relaxation period and rapid filling period showed decreased IVPD in CAD patients, but only the reduction in isovolumic relaxation period (IVPD-IVR) was statistical different between patients with elevated LVEDP and normal LVEDP (1.03 ± 0.42 mmHg vs. 2.25 ± 1.21 mmHg, p < 0.01). IVPD-IVR had the best correlation with LVEDP (r=-0.499, p < 0.01) among IVPDs. Lower IVPD-IVR was associated with higher risk of elevated LVEDP. Evaluating IVPD-IVR might improve the diagnostic algorithm for predicting elevated LVEDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.