Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39533031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Detection and identification of centipedes based on deep learning.

Weitao Chen, Zhaoli Yao, Tao Wang, Fu Yang, Weiwei Zu, Chong Yao, Liangquan Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weitao ChenSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Zhaoli YaoHuzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Tao WangSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Fu YangSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Weiwei ZuSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Chong YaoHuzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, China. ycu@hzhospital.com.
Liangquan JiaSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. 02426@zjhu.edu.cn.

Funding

by the Major Project for the Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Jointly Established by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Zhejiang Province GZY-ZJ-KJ-24050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantification of centipede populations is one of the key measures in achieving intelligent management of edible centipedes and promoting the upgrade of the rural centipede industry chain. However, current centipede counting techniques still face several challenges, including low detection accuracy, large model size, and difficulty in deployment on mobile devices. These challenges have limited existing network models to the experimental stage, preventing their practical application. To tackle the identified challenges, this study introduces a lightweight centipede detection model (FCM-YOLO), which enhances detection performance while ensuring fast processing and broad applicability. Based on the YOLOv5s framework, this model incorporates the C3FS module, resulting in fewer parameters and increased detection speed. Additionally, it integrates an attention module (CBAM) to suppress irrelevant information and improve target focus, thus enhancing detection accuracy. Furthermore, to enhance the precision of bounding box positioning, this study proposes a new loss function, CMPDIOU, for bounding box loss. Experimental results show that FCM-YOLO, while reducing parameter size, achieves an improved detection accuracy of 97.4% (2.7% higher than YOLOv5s) and reduces floating-point operations (FLOPs) to 11.5G (4.3G lower than YOLOv5s). In summary, this paper provides novel insights into the detection and enumeration of centipedes, contributing to the advancement of intelligent agricultural practices.

Indexed as

CentipedeComputer visionCountingObject detectionYOLOv5

Identifiers

PMID39533031
PMCPMC11557911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.