ArticleScientific reports2024
Detection and identification of centipedes based on deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quantification of centipede populations is one of the key measures in achieving intelligent management of edible centipedes and promoting the upgrade of the rural centipede industry chain. However, current centipede counting techniques still face several challenges, including low detection accuracy, large model size, and difficulty in deployment on mobile devices. These challenges have limited existing network models to the experimental stage, preventing their practical application. To tackle the identified challenges, this study introduces a lightweight centipede detection model (FCM-YOLO), which enhances detection performance while ensuring fast processing and broad applicability. Based on the YOLOv5s framework, this model incorporates the C3FS module, resulting in fewer parameters and increased detection speed. Additionally, it integrates an attention module (CBAM) to suppress irrelevant information and improve target focus, thus enhancing detection accuracy. Furthermore, to enhance the precision of bounding box positioning, this study proposes a new loss function, CMPDIOU, for bounding box loss. Experimental results show that FCM-YOLO, while reducing parameter size, achieves an improved detection accuracy of 97.4% (2.7% higher than YOLOv5s) and reduces floating-point operations (FLOPs) to 11.5G (4.3G lower than YOLOv5s). In summary, this paper provides novel insights into the detection and enumeration of centipedes, contributing to the advancement of intelligent agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.