Observational studyBone marrow transplantation2025
Satisfactory outcomes following a second autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in poor stem cell mobilizers: a retrospective study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.
Observational study in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01362972 (Analysis of Data Collected in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Data Collected in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry on a Cohort of Patients Receiving Plerixafor
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salvage or Second Autologous SCT in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (2016-2026): A Decade in Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Retrospective Analysis of R-COMP Therapy in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Assessing the Impact of Sample Selection Bias.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic cell transplants (auto-HCTs) remain the standard of care for transplant-eligible MM patients. The general practice has been to undergo upfront apheresis following induction to collect sufficient number of CD34+ cells to facilitate two auto-HCTs. However, 5-30% of MM patients do not initially mobilise a sufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells and are classified as poor mobilizers (PM). We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes of 61 PMs and 816 non-PM patients who underwent a second auto-HCT and who were enrolled in the non-interventional CALM study (NCT01362972). Only patients who collected CD34+ prior to auto-HCT1 were included. Auto-HCT2 comprised both tandem and salvage transplants. PMs were re-mobilized with plerixafor (n = 24, 39.3%) or non-plerixafor-based regimens (n = 37, 60.7%). There were no significant differences in engraftment, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after the second auto-HCT between PM and non-PM patients. There was a trend to shorter PFS in PM patients undergoing salvage auto-HCT (median 9.6 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.08) but no significant difference in OS. The median OS was 41.1 months for PM and 41.2 months for non-PM patients (p = 0.86). These data suggest that salvage mobilization is effective and does not affect overall outcomes after a second auto-HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39533015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.